Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26393929›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Exploring a Tomato Landraces Collection for Fruit-Related Traits by the Aid of a High-Throughput Genomic Platform.

Adriana Sacco, Valentino Ruggieri, Mario Parisi, Giovanna Festa, Maria Manuela Rigano, Maurizio Enea Picarella, Andrea Mazzucato, Amalia Barone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genome-wide meta-QTL approach identifies consensus loci associated with agriculturally important tomato fruit traits.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana SaccoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Valentino RuggieriDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Mario ParisiConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria, Centro di ricerca per l'Orticoltura, Pontecagnano, Italy.
Giovanna FestaConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria, Centro di ricerca per l'Orticoltura, Pontecagnano, Italy.
Maria Manuela RiganoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Maurizio Enea PicarellaDepartment of Science and Technologies for Agriculture, Forestry, Nature and Energy (DAFNE University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy).
Andrea MazzucatoDepartment of Science and Technologies for Agriculture, Forestry, Nature and Energy (DAFNE University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy).
Amalia BaroneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Centro di Ricerca per l’Orticoltura · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During its evolution and domestication Solanum lycopersicum has undergone various genetic 'bottlenecks' and extreme inbreeding of limited genotypes. In Europe the tomato found a secondary centre for diversification, which resulted in a wide array of fruit shape variation given rise to a range of landraces that have been cultivated for centuries. Landraces represent a reservoir of genetic diversity especially for traits such as abiotic stress resistance and high fruit quality. Information about the variation present among tomato landrace populations is still limited. A collection of 123 genotypes from different geographical areas was established with the aim of capturing a wide diversity. Eighteen morphological traits were evaluated, mainly related to the fruit. About 45% of morphological variation was attributed to fruit shape, as estimated by the principal component analysis, and the dendrogram of relatedness divided the population in subgroups mainly on the basis of fruit weight and locule number. Genotyping was carried out using the tomato array platform SolCAP able to interrogate 7,720 SNPs. In the whole collection 87.1% markers were polymorphic but they decreased to 44-54% when considering groups of genotypes with different origin. The neighbour-joining tree analysis clustered the 123 genotypes into two main branches. The STRUCTURE analysis with K = 3 also divided the population on the basis of fruit size. A genomic-wide association strategy revealed 36 novel markers associated to the variation of 15 traits. The markers were mapped on the tomato chromosomes together with 98 candidate genes for the traits analyzed. Six regions were evidenced in which candidate genes co-localized with 19 associated SNPs. In addition, 17 associated SNPs were localized in genomic regions lacking candidate genes. The identification of these markers demonstrated that novel variability was captured in our germoplasm collection. They might also provide a viable indirect selection tool in future practical breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantCluster AnalysisFruitGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID26393929
PMCPMC4579088
OpenAlexW2311981443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.