Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26393661›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2015

Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast.

Sarah A Sabatinos, Susan L Forsburg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MonitoringBiology open · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shelterin components mediate genome reorganization in response to replication stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah A SabatinosDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada. ssabatinos@ryerson.ca.
Susan L ForsburgProgram in Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Forsburg@usc.edu.
Toronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Checkpoints and Double Strand Breaks in S. Pombe MeiosisR01GM081418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FORSBURG, SUSAN L · 2009 to 2014
$2.2M
Structural instability and DNA rearrangements in the centromereR01GM111040 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FORSBURG, SUSAN L · 2014 to 2015
$626k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM111040-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081418NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081418-04NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication fork stalling generates a variety of responses, most of which cause an increase in single-stranded DNA. ssDNA is a primary signal of replication distress that activates cellular checkpoints. It is also a potential source of genome instability and a substrate for mutation and recombination. Therefore, managing ssDNA levels is crucial to chromosome integrity. Limited ssDNA accumulation occurs in wild-type cells under stress. In contrast, cells lacking the replication checkpoint cannot arrest forks properly and accumulate large amounts of ssDNA. This likely occurs when the replication fork polymerase and helicase units are uncoupled. Some cells with mutations in the replication helicase (mcm-ts) mimic checkpoint-deficient cells, and accumulate extensive areas of ssDNA to trigger the G2-checkpoint. Another category of helicase mutant (mcm4-degron) causes fork stalling in early S-phase due to immediate loss of helicase function. Intriguingly, cells realize that ssDNA is present, but fail to detect that they accumulate ssDNA, and continue to divide. Thus, the cellular response to replication stalling depends on checkpoint activity and the time that replication stress occurs in S-phase. In this review we describe the signs, signals, and symptoms of replication arrest from an ssDNA perspective. We explore the possible mechanisms for these effects. We also advise the need for caution when detecting and interpreting data related to the accumulation of ssDNA.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedDNA DamageHumansSchizosaccharomycesDNA, FungalDNA, Single-StrandedcheckpointDNA replicationgenome stabilityhelicaseMCMreplication stressRPASchizosaccharomyces pombesingle-stranded DNA

Identifiers

PMID26393661
PMCPMC4598791
OpenAlexW2165134443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.