Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26393098›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2014

Multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia: trends, characteristics and treatment outcomes.

L Kuksa, V Riekstina, V Leimane, I Ozere, G Skenders, R Van den Bergh, K Kremer, C D Acosta, A D Harries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L KuksaRiga East University Hospital TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia ; Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
V RiekstinaRiga East University Hospital TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia.
V LeimaneRiga East University Hospital TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia.
I OzereRiga East University Hospital TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia ; Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
G SkendersRiga East University Hospital TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia.
R Van den BerghMedical Department, Operational Center Brussels, Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF-Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
K KremerTuberculosis and M/XDR-TB Programme, Division of Communicable Diseases, Health Security & Environment, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
C D AcostaTuberculosis and M/XDR-TB Programme, Division of Communicable Diseases, Health Security & Environment, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
A D HarriesInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France ; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingDrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is an important public health problem in Latvia.

objectiveTo document trends, characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered patients with multi-drug-resistant (MDR-) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR-) TB in Latvia from 2000 to 2010.

designA retrospective national cohort study.

resultsOf 1779 patients, 1646 (92%) had MDR- and 133 (8%) XDR-TB. Over 11 years, the proportion of XDR-TB among MDR-TB patients increased from 2% to 18%. Compared to MDR-TB patients, those with XDR-TB were significantly more likely to have failed MDR-TB treatment (OR 8.4, 95%CI 4.3-16.2), have human immunodeficiency virus infection (OR 3.2, 95%CI 1.8-5.7), be illegal drug users (OR 5.7, 95%CI 2.6-11.6) or have had contact with MDR-TB patients (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.8). Cure rates for XDR-TB were 50%. Compared with MDR-TB patients, those with XDR-TB had a higher risk of treatment failure (29% vs. 8%, respectively, P < 0.001). Unfavourable treatment outcomes were significantly associated with being male; having smear-positive disease; pulmonary cavities; failure, default or relapse after previous MDR-TB treatment; and a history of incarceration.

conclusionMore MDR-TB in Latvia is now also XDR-TB. This study identified several risk factors for XDR-TB and, for unfavourable treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management of MDR-/XDR-TB.

Indexed as

EuropeLatviaoperational researchSORT ITXDR-TB

Identifiers

PMID26393098
PMCPMC4547513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.