Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26393039›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2013

Standard case management of asthma in Sudan: a pilot project.

A I El Sony, C-Y Chiang, E Malik, S A Hassanain, H Hussien, A H Khamis, A F Bassilli, D A Enarson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence and determinants of chronic respiratory diseases in adults in rural Sudan.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

A I El SonyEpi-Lab, Khartoum, Sudan.
C-Y ChiangInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France ; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan ; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
E MalikMinistry of Health, Madani, Gezira State, Sudan.
S A HassanainEpi-Lab, Khartoum, Sudan.
H HussienEpi-Lab, Khartoum, Sudan.
A H KhamisEpi-Lab, Khartoum, Sudan ; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Dammam, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
A F BassilliWorld Health Organization, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, Cairo, Egypt.
D A EnarsonInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FRTaipei Medical University · TWUniversity of Gezira · SDWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingA pilot project for asthma management in selected hospitals in Khartoum and Gezira States, Sudan.

objectiveTo assess standard case management of asthma in 2007-2008.

designLocal adaptation of guidelines, followed by situational analysis, pre-intervention study, training and implementation. Treatment outcome was assessed 1 year after patient enrolment.

resultsSituational analysis revealed that inhaled beclometasone was not available in the public sector. During the project, 2068 patients were enrolled: severity of asthma was intermittent in 185 (9.0%), mild persistent in 231 (11.2%), moderate persistent in 640 (31.0%), severe persistent in 812 (39.3%) and unclassified in 200 (9.7%). Of the 1654 patients with persistent asthma who were treated with inhaled corticosteroids, 1157 (70.0%) had treatment cards available for outcome assessment. Of these, 652 (56.4%) did not attend their annual evaluation, among whom 1 (0.1%) died and 651 (56.3%) were lost to follow-up. Of the 505 patients who attended their annual evaluation, 417 (82.6%) improved, 32 (6.3%) were stable and 56 (11.1%) were worse. The frequency of emergency visits and hospitalisation decreased substantially among those who presented for the 1 year follow-up assessment.

conclusionThe results of standard case management of asthma were encouraging; however, a high proportion of patients did not return for long-term management.

Indexed as

asthmafollow-upmanagementtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID26393039
PMCPMC4463127
OpenAlexW2328298140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.