Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392955›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2012

Why do child contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not come to the assessment clinic?

K Zimri, A C Hesseling, P Godfrey-Faussett, H S Schaaf, J A Seddon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07415499 (Retrospective Study on Patients Undergoing Mammographic Screening to Evaluate the Impact of Breast Density on Breast Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07415499 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective Study on Patients Undergoing Mammographic Screening to Evaluate the Impact of Breast Density on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-BraRan2026 to 2026Enrolled3,300ConditionsBreast Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Screening and DiagnosisArmsNo intervention is administered.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K ZimriDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
A C HesselingDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
P Godfrey-FaussettDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
H S SchaafDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa ; Tygerberg Children's Hospital, Tygerberg, South Africa.
J A SeddonDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa ; Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal policy advises that children exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) should be assessed in a specialist clinic. Many children, however, are not brought for assessment.

methodsFocus group discussion was used to design appropriate questionnaires. From 1 September 2011, the first 50 children referred to the specialist paediatric MDR-TB clinic, Cape Town, South Africa, and who attended their clinic appointment, were recruited. The first 50 children who were referred but who did not attend were concurrently identified, traced and recruited. Differences in group characteristics were compared.

resultsThe median age of the children was 35 months: 48 (48%) were boys, 4 (4%) were human immunodeficiency virus infected and 47 (47%) were of coloured ethnicity. Factors significantly associated with non-attendance at the MDR-TB clinic were: Coloured ethnicity (OR 2.82, 95%CI 1.21-6.59, P = 0.01), the mother being the source case (OR 3.78, 95%CI 1.29-11.1, P = 0.02), having a smoker resident in the house (OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.01-5.57, P = 0.04), the time (P = 0.002) and cost (P = 0.03) required to get to the specialist clinic, and fear of infection whilst waiting to be seen (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.07-5.60, P = 0.03).

conclusionsReasons for non-attendance at paediatric MDR-TB clinic appointments are complex and are influenced by demographic, social, logistical and cultural factors.

Indexed as

appointmentattendancepaediatricreferral

Identifiers

PMID26392955
PMCPMC4463038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.