Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392940›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2012

Why ethics is indispensable for good-quality operational research.

M Edginton, D Enarson, R Zachariah, T Reid, S Satyanarayana, K Bissell, S G Hinderaker, T Harries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M EdgintonCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France ; Ethics Advisory Group, The Union, Paris, France.
D EnarsonCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France.
R ZachariahOperational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels Operational Centre, Luxembourg.
T ReidOperational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels Operational Centre, Luxembourg.
S SatyanarayanaCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France ; The Union South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
K BissellCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France.
S G HinderakerCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France ; Center for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
T HarriesCentre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France ; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article outlines challenges encountered when ethics is taught and promoted in the Operational Research courses of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, with a focus on ethical issues related to studies that involve health records reviews. Problems observed by the Ethics Advisory Group include engagement of all stakeholders, maintenance of confidentiality and authorship. The omission of ethics in the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement and its explanatory commentary published in 2007 is highlighted and questioned.

Indexed as

ethicsMédecins Sans Frontièresoperational researchSTROBEThe Union

Identifiers

PMID26392940
PMCPMC4536562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.