ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2015
An innovative web based system for reporting rare diseases in paediatrics.
Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illicit drug toxicity from opioid, stimulant or sedative use in adolescents: results of a Canadian one-time cross-sectional study.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- Innovative technology and established partnerships-a recipe for rapid adaptability under emerging pandemic conditions.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2023Article
- Does active surveillance of serious and life-threatening adverse drug reactions improve reporting?Paediatrics & child health · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurveillance of rare diseases in children is an important aspect of public health. Rare diseases affect thousands of children worldwide. The Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) has been in existence since 1996, and provides an innovative means to undertake paediatric surveillance and increase awareness of childhood disorders that are high in disability, morbidity, mortality, and economic costs to society, despite their low frequency. Traditionally, CPSP used manual paper-based reporting on a monthly basis, which although had an impressive response rate, it had inherent longer processing times and costs associated with it.
objectivesTo provide an overview and evaluate an innovative web-based system that enables seamless reporting from participants across the country providing a quick, reliable and simple mechanism for the participants to submit data while yielding better data quality, timeliness and increased efficiencies.
methodsIn 2011, a proprietary electronic CPSP (eCPSP) system was developed to provide a simple, quick and reliable reporting environment for participants. It supports both the electronic and hardcopy reporting. The analysis presented in this paper was conducted based on usage data of this system.
resultsThe response rates of the new eCPSP were found to be very favorable with adjusted rate of 80%, which equals the baseline. Approximately 50% of online participants report the first day they receive the notification e-mail. The response time was also reduced considerably. Furthermore, there has been significant reduction in data handling related activities (by almost 70%) from estimated 690 hours per year. Finally, the number of cases reported that do not fit the study case criteria has fallen, likely because participants can now immediately access the case definition and protocol via the online system. This has reduced both staff and investigator time for case processing.
conclusionThe eCPSP has modernized the CPSP program from paper-based reporting to efficient online technology while maintaining the core principles of the program. This simple and intuitive approach has proven to be an efficient approach cutting response times significantly while maintaining the desired response rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.