Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392819›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2015

Human papilloma virus is not detectable in samples of urothelial bladder cancer in a central European population: a prospective translational study.

Sebastian C Schmid, Leonore Thümer, Tibor Schuster, Thomas Horn, Florian Kurtz, Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Judith Seebach, Michael Straub, Tobias Maurer, Michael Autenrieth and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human Papillomavirus in Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder: An Indian study.International journal of applied & basic medical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian C Schmid *Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Leonore Thümer *Department of Virology, Technische Universität/Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Tibor SchusterInstitute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas HornDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Florian KurtzDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Julia Slotta-HuspeninaInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Judith SeebachDepartment of Virology, Technische Universität/Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Michael StraubDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Tobias MaurerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Michael AutenriethDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Hubert KüblerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Margitta RetzDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike ProtzerDepartment of Virology, Technische Universität/Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen E GschwendDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Dieter HoffmannDepartment of Virology, Technische Universität/Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DETwitter (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious investigations on the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and human bladder cancer have led to conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine if low and high risk HPV play a role in the etiology of superficial low grade and invasive high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

methodsWe prospectively collected tumor samples of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder from 109 patients treated with transurethral resection or cystectomy, with bladder tissue from transurethral resection of the prostate serving as control. Unfixed, frozen tumor samples were analyzed for the presence of 14 high risk HPV types using real time PCR. Additionally, all specimens were tested for 35 low risk HPV types with a conventional PCR using degenerate primers located in the L1 region. Six frozen samples of cervical carcinoma served as positive controls.

resultsWe included 109 cases of bladder cancer with 41 superficial (pTa low grade) tumors, 56 invasive (pT1-T4) high grade tumors and 12 others (pTa high grade + pTis). We have not detected HPV-DNA in any sample (95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0-3.3 %), superficial tumors (95 % CI 0-6.4 %) or in invasive tumors (95 % CI 0-8.6 %) with correct positive controls.

conclusionsUsing a broad, sensitive assay with prospectively collected specimens of a Central European population we could not detect HPV-DNA in any of the cases. Our results suggest that it is unlikely that HPV infections play a major role in the development of urothelial bladder cancer.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerHPVPapillomavirusPCRPolymerase chain reactionUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID26392819
PMCPMC4576373
OpenAlexW1948229279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.