Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392803›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology2014

Evaluation of the efficiency of tumor and tissue delivery of carrier-mediated agents (CMA) and small molecule (SM) agents in mice using a novel pharmacokinetic (PK) metric: relative distribution index over time (RDI-OT).

Andrew J Madden, Sumit Rawal, Katie Sandison, Ryan Schell, Allison Schorzman, Allison Deal, Lan Feng, Ping Ma, Russell Mumper, Joseph DeSimone and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J MaddenDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
Sumit RawalDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
Katie SandisonDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
Ryan SchellDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
Allison SchorzmanDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
Allison DealLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lan FengCenter for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ping MaCenter for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Russell MumperUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Joseph DeSimoneLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
William C ZamboniDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 120 Mason Farm Road, Suite 1013, CB 7361, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7361, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DESIMONE, JOSEPH M. · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of carrier-mediated agents (CMA) is dependent upon the carrier system. As a result, CMA PK differs greatly from the PK of small molecule (SM) drugs. Advantages of CMAs over SMs include prolonged circulation time in plasma, increased delivery to tumors, increased antitumor response, and decreased toxicity. In theory, CMAs provide greater tumor drug delivery than SMs due to their prolonged plasma circulation time. We sought to create a novel PK metric to evaluate the efficiency of tumor and tissue delivery of CMAs and SMs. We conducted a study evaluating the plasma, tumor, liver, and spleen PK of CMAs and SMs in mice bearing subcutaneous flank tumors using standard PK parameters and a novel PK metric entitled relative distribution over time (RDI-OT), which measures efficiency of delivery. RDI-OT is defined as the ratio of tissue drug concentration to plasma drug concentration at each time point. The standard concentration versus time area under the curve values (AUC) of CMAs were higher in all tissues and plasma compared with SMs. However, 8 of 17 SMs had greater tumor RDI-OT AUC

Indexed as

ChemotherapyDrug deliveryNanomedicineNanoparticlesPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID26392803
PMCPMC4574509
OpenAlexW1978433681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.