Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392545›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Genome and transcriptome of the regeneration-competent flatworm, Macrostomum lignano.

Kaja Wasik, James Gurtowski, Xin Zhou, Olivia Mendivil Ramos, M Joaquina Delás, Giorgia Battistoni, Osama El Demerdash, Ilaria Falciatori, Dita B Vizoso, Andrew D Smith and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional genomics in Spiralia.Briefings in functional genomics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kaja WasikWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724;
James GurtowskiWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724;
Xin ZhouWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, Stony Brook University, NY 11794;
Olivia Mendivil RamosWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724;
M Joaquina DelásWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom;
Giorgia BattistoniWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom;
Osama El DemerdashWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724;
Ilaria FalciatoriWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom;
Dita B VizosoDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland;
Andrew D SmithDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089;
Peter LadurnerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Lukas SchärerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland;
W Richard McCombieWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724;
Gregory J HannonWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom; greg.hannon@cruk.cam.ac.uk mschatz@cshl.edu.
Michael SchatzWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; greg.hannon@cruk.cam.ac.uk mschatz@cshl.edu.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Computational Methods for Genome Assembly, Transcript Assembly, and Variant DiscoveryR01HG006677 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2025
$10.7M
Roles of small RNAs in guarding germ cell genomesR37GM062534 · NIGMS · NEW YORK GENOME CENTER · PI HANNON, GREGORY J · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Cancer Research UK 21143NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA045508NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006677NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG006677NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM062534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The free-living flatworm, Macrostomum lignano has an impressive regenerative capacity. Following injury, it can regenerate almost an entirely new organism because of the presence of an abundant somatic stem cell population, the neoblasts. This set of unique properties makes many flatworms attractive organisms for studying the evolution of pathways involved in tissue self-renewal, cell-fate specification, and regeneration. The use of these organisms as models, however, is hampered by the lack of a well-assembled and annotated genome sequences, fundamental to modern genetic and molecular studies. Here we report the genomic sequence of M. lignano and an accompanying characterization of its transcriptome. The genome structure of M. lignano is remarkably complex, with ∼75% of its sequence being comprised of simple repeats and transposon sequences. This has made high-quality assembly from Illumina reads alone impossible (N50=222 bp). We therefore generated 130× coverage by long sequencing reads from the Pacific Biosciences platform to create a substantially improved assembly with an N50 of 64 Kbp. We complemented the reference genome with an assembled and annotated transcriptome, and used both of these datasets in combination to probe gene-expression patterns during regeneration, examining pathways important to stem cell function.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGenes, HelminthGenome, HelminthHelminth ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlatyhelminthsRegenerationSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidStem CellsTranscriptomeHelminth ProteinsflatwormgenomeMacrostomumneoblastregeneration

Identifiers

PMID26392545
PMCPMC4603488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.