Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392323›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Beating the odds: efficacy and toxicity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase-driven adaptive dosing of 5-FU in patients with digestive cancer.

Manon Launay, Laetitia Dahan, Manon Duval, Anne Rodallec, Gérard Milano, Muriel Duluc, Bruno Lacarelle, Joseph Ciccolini, Jean-Francois Seitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ethnic Diversity of DPD Activity and thePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Oncotarget · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manon LaunayLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Laetitia DahanDigestive Oncology Unit, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Manon DuvalLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Anne RodallecLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Gérard MilanoOncopharmacology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice.
Muriel DulucDigestive Oncology Unit, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Bruno LacarelleLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Joseph CiccoliniLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Jean-Francois SeitzDigestive Oncology Unit, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille.
Hôpital de la Timone · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims5-FU is the backbone of most regimens in digestive oncology. Administration of standard 5-FU leads to 15-30% of severe side effects, and lethal toxicities are regularly reported with fluoropyrimidine drugs. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome responsible for most cases of life-threatening toxicities upon 5-FU intake, and pre-treatment checking for DPD status should help to reduce both incidence and severity of side effects through adaptive dosing strategies.

methodsWe have used a simple method for rapidly establishing the DPD phenotype of patients with cancer and used it prospectively in 59 routine patients treated with 5-FU-based therapy for digestive cancers. No patient with total DPD deficiency was found but 23% of patients exhibited poor metabolizer phenotype, and one patient was phenotyped as profoundly deficient. Consequently, 5-FU doses in poor metabolizer patients were cut by an average 35% as compared with non deficient patients (2390 ± 1225 mg vs. 3653 ± 1371 mg, P < 0.003, t-test).

resultsDespite this marked reduction in 5-FU dosing, similar efficacy was achieved in the two subsets (clinical benefit: 40 vs. 43%, stable disease: 40 vs. 37%, progressive disease: 20% in both subsets, P = 0.893, Pearson's chi-square). No difference in toxicities was observed (P = 0.104, Fisher's exact test). Overall, only 3% of early severe toxicities were recorded, a value markedly lower than the 15-30% ones usually reported with 5-FU.

conclusionsThis feasibility study shows how simplified DPD-based adaptive dosing of 5-FU can reduce sharply the incidence of treatment-related severe toxicities while maintaining efficacy as part of routine clinical practice in digestive oncology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDigestive System NeoplasmsDihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DeficiencyDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Fluorouracil5-FUadaptive dosingdigestive oncologyDPD deficencyefficacytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID26392323
PMCPMC4693577
OpenAlexW2296046501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.