Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392127›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2016

An international systematic review of smoking prevalence in addiction treatment.

Joseph Guydish, Emma Passalacqua, Anna Pagano, Cristina Martínez, Thao Le, JongSerl Chun, Barbara Tajima, Lindsay Docto, Daria Garina, Kevin Delucchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph GuydishUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emma PassalacquaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anna PaganoUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cristina MartínezTobacco Control Unit, Cancer Prevention and Control Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Thao LeUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
JongSerl ChunDepartment of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Barbara TajimaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lindsay DoctoUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daria GarinaUniversity of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kevin DelucchiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lee University · USUniversity of San Francisco · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USEwha Womans University · KRInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

TREATMENTS FOR COMPLEX PATIENTS IN NEW SETTINGSP50DA009253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MEYERHOFF, DIETER J · 1994 to 2014
$28.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSmoking prevalence is higher among people enrolled in addiction treatment compared with the general population, and very high rates of smoking are associated with opiate drug use and receipt of opiate replacement therapy (ORT). We assessed whether these findings are observed internationally.

methodsPubMed, PsycINFO and the Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Science Database were searched for papers reporting smoking prevalence among addiction treatment samples, published in English, from 1987 to 2013. Search terms included tobacco use, cessation and substance use disorders using and/or Boolean connectors. For 4549 papers identified, abstracts were reviewed by multiple raters; 239 abstracts met inclusion criteria and these full papers were reviewed for exclusion. Fifty-four studies, collectively comprising 37,364 participants, were included. For each paper we extracted country, author, year, sample size and gender, treatment modality, primary drug treated and smoking prevalence.

resultsThe random-effect pooled estimate of smoking across people in addiction treatment was 84% [confidence interval (CI) = 79, 88%], while the pooled estimate of smoking prevalence across matched population samples was 31% (CI = 29, 33%). The difference in the pooled estimates was 52% (CI = 48%, 57%, P < .0001). Smoking rates were higher in programs treating opiate use compared with alcohol use [odds ratio (OR) = 2.52, CI = 2.00, 3.17], and higher in ORT compared to out-patient programs (OR = 1.42, CI = 1.19, 1.68).

conclusionsSmoking rates among people in addiction treatment are more than double those of people with similar demographic characteristics. Smoking rates are also higher in people being treated for opiate dependence compared with people being treated for alcohol use disorder.

Indexed as

FemaleGlobal HealthHumansMalePrevalenceSmokingSmoking PreventionSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionco-substance useglobal healthpriority/special populationssmokingsurveillance and monitoringtobacco

Identifiers

PMID26392127
PMCPMC4990064
OpenAlexW1907559804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.