Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26392080›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2015

Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Extensive Natural Variation in the Model Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Jonathan M Flowers, Khaled M Hazzouri, Gina M Pham, Ulises Rosas, Tayebeh Bahmani, Basel Khraiwesh, David R Nelson, Kenan Jijakli, Rasha Abdrabu, Elizabeth H Harris and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. From nets to networks: tools for deciphering phytoplankton metabolic interactions within communities and their global significance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative Phenotyping of Two Commonly UsedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan M FlowersCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-205X
Khaled M HazzouriCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Gina M PhamCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-7862
Ulises RosasCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Tayebeh BahmaniCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Basel KhraiweshCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Division of Science and Math, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-1263
David R NelsonDivision of Science and Math, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Kenan JijakliDivision of Science and Math, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-1239
Rasha AbdrabuDivision of Science and Math, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Elizabeth H HarrisDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Paul A LefebvreDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-7753
Erik F Y HomDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi 38677.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-0031
Kourosh Salehi-AshtianiCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Division of Science and Math, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates ksa3@nyu.edu mp132@nyu.edu.
Michael D PuruggananCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 ksa3@nyu.edu mp132@nyu.edu.
New York University Abu Dhabi · AENew York University · USDuke University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed whole-genome resequencing of 12 field isolates and eight commonly studied laboratory strains of the model organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to characterize genomic diversity and provide a resource for studies of natural variation. Our data support previous observations that Chlamydomonas is among the most diverse eukaryotic species. Nucleotide diversity is ∼3% and is geographically structured in North America with some evidence of admixture among sampling locales. Examination of predicted loss-of-function mutations in field isolates indicates conservation of genes associated with core cellular functions, while genes in large gene families and poorly characterized genes show a greater incidence of major effect mutations. De novo assembly of unmapped reads recovered genes in the field isolates that are absent from the CC-503 assembly. The laboratory reference strains show a genomic pattern of polymorphism consistent with their origin as the recombinant progeny of a diploid zygospore. Large duplications or amplifications are a prominent feature of laboratory strains and appear to have originated under laboratory culture. Extensive natural variation offers a new source of genetic diversity for studies of Chlamydomonas, including naturally occurring alleles that may prove useful in studies of gene function and the dissection of quantitative genetic traits.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMutationAllelesChlamydomonas reinhardtiiGenome, PlantLaboratoriesMultigene FamilyPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26392080
PMCPMC4815094
OpenAlexW1932608348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.