Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391997›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication.

Nicole H Scheidler, Cheng Liu, Kelly A Hamby, Frank G Zalom, Zainulabeuddin Syed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microbial Odorant Detection Guides Drosophila Parasitoids Seeking Hosts in Fermenting Fruits.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Scent and adhesion drive insect dispersal of environmental yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. HowBiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-specific site preferences in response to resource value inBehavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. iScience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole H ScheidlerDepartment of Biological Sciences &Eck Institute for Global Health University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Cheng LiuCenter for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Kelly A HambyEntomology Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Frank G ZalomEntomology and Nematology Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Zainulabeuddin SyedDepartment of Biological Sciences &Eck Institute for Global Health University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the yeasts. Thus, it remained an exciting avenue to study whether fly spp. detect and discriminate yeast strains based on odor alone, and if so, how such resolution is achieved by the olfactory system in flies. We used two fly species known to exploit different niches and harboring different yeasts, D. suzukii (a pest of fresh fruit) and D. melanogaster (a saprophytic fly and a neurogenetic model organism). We initially established the behavioral preference of both fly species to six Drosophila-associated yeasts; then chemically analyzed the VOC profile of each yeast which revealed quantitative and qualitative differences; and finally isolated and identified the physiologically active constituents from yeast VOCs for each drosophilid that potentially define attraction. By employing chemical, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, we provide a comprehensive portrait of the olfactory neuroethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats.

Indexed as

OdorantsVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsDrosophilaYeastsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID26391997
PMCPMC4585764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.