Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391697›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2016

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.

Kai Kaarniranta, Kirsi Ikäheimo, Eliisa Mannermaa, Auli Ropo

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prodrug Approach as a Strategy to Enhance Drug Permeability.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension with Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy: Results from the VISIONARY Study Population in Spain.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kai KaarnirantaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland. kai.kaarniranta@uef.fi.
Kirsi IkäheimoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
Eliisa MannermaaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
Auli RopoSanten Oy, Tampere, Finland.
Kuopio University Hospital · FISanten (Finland) · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and timolol were compared after single (Day 1) and repeated (Day 8) instillations of once-daily tafluprost 0.0015%-timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FDC), once-daily PF tafluprost 0.0015%, and twice-daily PF timolol 0.5%. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifteen healthy volunteers were randomized to this double-masked, single-center, three-period cross-over study. A wash-out interval of at least 4 weeks separated each three 8-day dosing period. Blood samples were drawn on the first and last day of each dosing period, prior to the morning dose, as well as 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post-dosing. Sample plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and/or timolol were determined and maximum concentration (C max), area under the concentration-over-time curve from time zero to the last time point with a quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last), and time to maximum concentration were calculated. Intraocular pressure (IOP), adverse events, and ocular/systemic safety variables were also evaluated.

resultsPlasma concentrations of tafluprost acid were low, with similar levels measured subsequent to either single or repeated dosing of PF FDC and PF tafluprost. On both sampling days, concentrations peaked at 10 min after the dose, and were cleared from the blood circulation by 30 min; average C max ranged from 17 to 24 pg/mL, and AUC0-last from 3 to 5 pg*h/mL. Plasma concentrations of timolol were comparable after the first dose of PF FDC or PF timolol. Concentrations peaked at 15 min post-dose and diminished in a similar manner after 2 h; average C max was 800 pg/mL and AUC0-last 3900 pg*h/mL. As expected, PF timolol produced a higher Day 8 pre-dose timolol concentration than PF FDC (235 vs. 37 pg/mL; p < 0.001, respectively). The Day 8 post-dose changes in timolol concentrations were relative to this pre-dose difference. All study treatments were well tolerated and safe. PF FDC seemed to provide the best IOP reduction.

conclusionsPF FDC demonstrated good IOP-lowering efficacy and displayed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics to the monotherapy agents. Exposure to timolol was reduced via the halved dosing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstaglandins FTimololYoung AdultDrug CombinationsProstaglandins FtafluprostTimolol

Identifiers

PMID26391697
OpenAlexW1710083448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.