Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391628›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Involving migrants in the development of guidelines for communication in cross-cultural general practice consultations: a participatory learning and action research project.

Mary O'Reilly-de Brún, Anne MacFarlane, Tomas de Brún, Ekaterina Okonkwo, Jean Samuel Bonsenge Bokanga, Maria Manuela De Almeida Silva, Florence Ogbebor, Aga Mierzejewska, Lovina Nnadi, Maria van den Muijsenbergh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Participatory health research with migrants: Opportunities, challenges, and way forwards.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Helen Lester Memorial Lecture 2018: the leper squint: spaces for participation in primary health care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  12. Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Giving voice to the voiceless: how to involve vulnerable migrants in healthcare research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mary O'Reilly-de BrúnNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Anne MacFarlaneUniversity of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Tomas de BrúnNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Ekaterina OkonkwoNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland Galway Migrant Service, Galway, Ireland.
Jean Samuel Bonsenge BokangaNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Maria Manuela De Almeida SilvaNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland Portuguese Association of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Florence OgbeborNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Aga MierzejewskaNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Lovina NnadiNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Maria van den MuijsenberghRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, the Netherlands.
Evelyn van Weel-BaumgartenRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, the Netherlands.
Chris van WeelRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, the Netherlands Australian National University, Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this research was to involve migrants and other key stakeholders in a participatory dialogue to develop a guideline for enhancing communication in cross-cultural general practice consultations. In this paper, we focus on findings about the use of formal versus informal interpreters because dialogues about these issues emerged as central to the identification of recommendations for best practice.

designThis qualitative case study involved a Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) research methodology.

participantsThe sample comprised 80 stakeholders: 51 from migrant communities; 15 general practitioners (GPs) and general practice staff; 7 established migrants as peer researchers; 5 formal, trained interpreters; and 2 service planners from the national health authority.

settingGalway, Ireland.

resultsThere was 100% consensus across stakeholder groups that while informal interpreters have uses for migrants and general practice staff, they are not considered acceptable as best practice. There was also 100% consensus that formal interpreters who are trained and working as per a professional code of practice are acceptable as best practice.

conclusionsPolicymakers and service planners need to work in partnership with service providers and migrants to progress the implementation of professional, trained interpreters as a routine way of working in general practice.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchGeneral PracticeLanguagePractice Guidelines as TopicTransients and MigrantsAdultAgedCulturally Competent CareFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTranslatingPRIMARY CAREQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26391628
PMCPMC4577965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.