Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391513›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

A comprehensive study on different modelling approaches to predict platelet deposition rates in a perfusion chamber.

Jordi Pallarès, Oriol Senan, Roger Guimerà, Anton Vernet, Antoni Aguilar-Mogas, Gemma Vilahur, Lina Badimon, Marta Sales-Pardo, Salvatore Cito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordi PallarèsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Oriol SenanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Roger GuimeràDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Anton VernetDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Antoni Aguilar-MogasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Gemma VilahurCatalan Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025 Spain.
Lina BadimonCatalan Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, CSIC-ICCC, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025 Spain.
Marta Sales-PardoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Av Paїsos Catalans 26, 43007, Spain.
Salvatore CitoUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helsinki, Viikinkaari 9 00014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombus formation is a multiscale phenomenon triggered by platelet deposition over a protrombotic surface (eg. a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque). Despite the medical urgency for computational tools that aid in the early diagnosis of thrombotic events, the integration of computational models of thrombus formation at different scales requires a comprehensive understanding of the role and limitation of each modelling approach. We propose three different modelling approaches to predict platelet deposition. Specifically, we consider measurements of platelet deposition under blood flow conditions in a perfusion chamber for different time periods (3, 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes) at shear rates of 212 s(-1), 1390 s(-1) and 1690 s(-1). Our modelling approaches are: i) a model based on the mass-transfer boundary layer theory; ii) a machine-learning approach; and iii) a phenomenological model. The results indicate that the three approaches on average have median errors of 21%, 20.7% and 14.2%, respectively. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using an empirical data set as a proxy for a real-patient scenario in which practitioners have accumulated data on a given number of patients and want to obtain a diagnosis for a new patient about whom they only have the current observation of a certain number of variables.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPlatelet AggregationThrombosisAlgorithmsBlood PlateletsComputer SimulationHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26391513
PMCPMC4585733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.