Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391444›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Count every newborn; a measurement improvement roadmap for coverage data.

Sarah G Moxon, Harriet Ruysen, Kate J Kerber, Agbessi Amouzou, Suzanne Fournier, John Grove, Allisyn C Moran, Lara M E Vaz, Hannah Blencowe, Niall Conroy and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 364 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 17 institutions in 10 countries.

Sarah G Moxon
Harriet Ruysen
Kate J Kerber
Agbessi Amouzou
Suzanne Fournier
John Grove
Allisyn C Moran
Lara M E Vaz
Hannah Blencowe
Niall Conroy
A Gülmezoglu
Joshua P Vogel
Barbara Rawlins
Rubayet Sayed
Kathleen Hill
Donna Vivio
Shamim A Qazi
Deborah Sitrin
Anna C Seale
Steve Wall
Troy Jacobs
Juan Ruiz Peláez
Tanya Guenther
Patricia S Coffey
Penny Dawson
Tanya Marchant
Peter Waiswa
Ashok Deorari
Christabel Enweronu-Laryea
Shams Arifeen
Anne C C Lee
Matthews Mathai
Joy E Lawn
Save the Children · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBWorld Health Organization · CHUnited States Agency for International Development · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USChildren's Investment Fund Foundation · GBInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohn Snow (United States) · USMakerere University · UGPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COSomaliland University of Technology · SOUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity Research Co (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP), launched in 2014, aims to end preventable newborn deaths and stillbirths, with national targets of ≤12 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births and ≤12 stillbirths per 1000 total births by 2030. This requires ambitious improvement of the data on care at birth and of small and sick newborns, particularly to track coverage, quality and equity.

methodsIn a multistage process, a matrix of 70 indicators were assessed by the Every Newborn steering group. Indicators were graded based on their availability and importance to ENAP, resulting in 10 core and 10 additional indicators. A consultation process was undertaken to assess the status of each ENAP core indicator definition, data availability and measurement feasibility. Coverage indicators for the specific ENAP treatment interventions were assigned task teams and given priority as they were identified as requiring the most technical work. Consultations were held throughout.

resultsENAP published 10 core indicators plus 10 additional indicators. Three core impact indicators (neonatal mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, stillbirth rate) are well defined, with future efforts needed to focus on improving data quantity and quality. Three core indicators on coverage of care for all mothers and newborns (intrapartum/skilled birth attendance, early postnatal care, essential newborn care) have defined contact points, but gaps exist in measuring content and quality of the interventions. Four core (antenatal corticosteroids, neonatal resuscitation, treatment of serious neonatal infections, kangaroo mother care) and one additional coverage indicator for newborns at risk or with complications (chlorhexidine cord cleansing) lack indicator definitions or data, especially for denominators (population in need). To address these gaps, feasible coverage indicator definitions are presented for validity testing. Measurable process indicators to help monitor health service readiness are also presented. A major measurement gap exists to monitor care of small and sick babies, yet signal functions could be tracked similarly to emergency obstetric care.

conclusionsThe ENAP Measurement Improvement Roadmap (2015-2020) outlines tools to be developed (e.g., improved birth and death registration, audit, and minimum perinatal dataset) and actions to test, validate and institutionalise proposed coverage indicators. The roadmap presents a unique opportunity to strengthen routine health information systems, crosslinking these data with civil registration and vital statistics and population-based surveys. Real measurement change requires intentional transfer of leadership to countries with the greatest disease burden and will be achieved by working with centres of excellence and existing networks.

Indexed as

Perinatal MortalityQuality ImprovementAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBreast FeedingChlorhexidineDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfectionsKangaroo-Mother Care MethodPerinatal DeathPostnatal CarePregnancyAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidine

Identifiers

PMID26391444
PMCPMC4577758
OpenAlexW1867913521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.