Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391356›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Construction of quality of life change patterns: example in oncology in a phase III therapeutic trial (FFCD 0307).

Gillles Nuemi, Hervé Devilliers, Karine Le Malicot, Rosine Guimbaud, Côme Lepage, Catherine Quantin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reporting of health-related quality of life in randomized controlled trials involving palliative systemic therapy for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gillles NuemiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Service de biostatistique et d'Informatique Médicale (DIM), BP 77908, 21079, Dijon, Cedex, France.
Hervé DevilliersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Service de biostatistique et d'Informatique Médicale (DIM), BP 77908, 21079, Dijon, Cedex, France.
Karine Le MalicotFFCD, Inserm, U866, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Rosine GuimbaudInserm, UMR 1037/CNRS-ERL 5294, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
Côme LepageCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Service de biostatistique et d'Informatique Médicale (DIM), BP 77908, 21079, Dijon, Cedex, France.
Catherine QuantinCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Service de biostatistique et d'Informatique Médicale (DIM), BP 77908, 21079, Dijon, Cedex, France. catherine.quantin@chu-dijon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQuality of life data in cancerology are often difficult to summarize due to missing data and difficulty to analyze the pattern of evolution in different groups of patients. The aim of this work was to apply a new methodology to construct Quality of Life (QoL) change patterns within patients included in a clinical trial comparing to regimen of treatment in locally advanced eosogastric cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this trial, QoL was assessed every 2 months by self-reported EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Physical dimension scores were analyzed. After multiple imputation of missing data, 27 statistical measures aiming to describe the variation of QoL measures among follow-up were computed for each patient. Based on these measures, patient were grouped into homogenous groups in terms of QoL variation pattern using a K-Means classification method. The mean QoL score at each time was graphically represented in each obtained pattern. Finally, clinical characteristic of patients in each pattern of QoL were described and compared.

resultsThe trial included 416 patients and 1023 questionnaire were collected. 74% of patients were male with a mean ± SD age of 62 ± 11 years. 43% of scores were missing. Patients were grouped into four classes of homogeneous QoL variation patterns. 1) a Pattern of 24 (6%) patients showing improvement in QoL with a mean variation of +10.7 points on the 0-100 scale, 2) a Pattern of 171 (41 %) patients showing a stability 3) two Patterns of 78 (19%) and 143 (34%) patients respectively showing a deterioration of QoL with a mean variation of -67.2 and -67.6, respectively. There were no difference between patterns in terms of gender or age. Patients within "degradation" pattern had significantly lower performance status (p = 0.015), higher severe after-effects rate (p < 10-3) and death rate (p < 10-3).

conclusionThis work opens up perspectives for longitudinal data analysis with a high probability of missing values while providing a relevant graphical summary. Patterns of QoL evolution with clinical relevance may help to interpret longitudinal QoL data in Cancer studies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicSickness Impact ProfileAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26391356
PMCPMC4578418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.