ReviewDNA repair2015
Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes.
Review in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncogenic p53 induces mitotic errors in lung cancer cells by recopying DNA replication forks conferring targetable proliferation advantage.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between chromatin state and ATM signalling in DNA damage-induced transcription stress.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Stimulation of mouse hematopoietic stem cells by angiogenin and DNA preparations.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024Article
- The Tumor Suppressor BRCA1/2, Cancer Susceptibility and Genome Instability in Gynecological and Mammary Cancers.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Ribosome biogenesis in disease: new players and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Immediate-Early, Early, and Late Responses to DNA Double Stranded Breaks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- KAT5 histone acetyltransferase mutations in cancer cells.microPublication biology · 2022Article
- Editorial: Mechanisms guarding the genome.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Schizosaccharomyces pombe KAT5 contributes to resection and repair of a DNA double-strand break.Genetics · 2021Article
- Regulation of DNA duplication by the mTOR signaling pathway.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2021Review
- From Development to Aging: The Path to Cellular Senescence.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2021Review
- Target binding and residence: a new determinant of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021Review
- Lysine Methyltransferase Inhibitors Impair H4K20me2 and 53BP1 Foci in Response to DNA Damage in Sarcomas, a Synthetic Lethality Strategy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Imaging of metabolic activity adaptations to UV stress, drugs and differentiation at cellular resolution in skin and skin equivalents - Implications for oxidative UV damage.Redox biology · 2020Article
- The E2F1 transcription factor and RB tumor suppressor moonlight as DNA repair factors.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Review
- The Intermediate Filament Synemin Regulates Non-Homologous End Joining in an ATM-Dependent Manner.Cancers · 2020Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of the Human Papillomavirus Life Cycle.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The DNA damage response is a widely used term that encompasses all signaling initiated at DNA lesions and damaged replication forks as it extends to orchestrate DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, cell death and senescence. ATM, an apical DNA damage signaling kinase, is virtually instantaneously activated following the introduction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, which has a catalytic role in DNA repair, and the KAT5 (Tip60) acetyltransferase are required for maximal ATM kinase activation in cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. The sensing of DNA lesions occurs within a highly complex and heterogeneous chromatin environment. Chromatin decondensation and histone eviction at DSBs may be permissive for KAT5 binding to H3K9me3 and H3K36me3, ATM kinase acetylation and activation. Furthermore, chromatin perturbation may be a prerequisite for most DNA repair. Nucleosome disassembly during DNA repair was first reported in the 1970s by Smerdon and colleagues when nucleosome rearrangement was noted during the process of nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage in human cells. Recently, the multi-functional protein nucleolin was identified as the relevant histone chaperone required for partial nucleosome disruption at DBSs, the recruitment of repair enzymes and for DNA repair. Notably, ATM kinase is activated by chromatin perturbations induced by a variety of treatments that do not directly cause DSBs, including treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Central to the mechanisms that activate ATR, the second apical DNA damage signaling kinase, outside of a stalled and collapsed replication fork in S-phase, is chromatin decondensation and histone eviction associated with DNA end resection at DSBs. Thus, a stress that is common to both ATM and ATR kinase activation is chromatin perturbations, and we argue that chromatin perturbations are both sufficient and required for induction of the DNA damage response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.