Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391249›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2015

[Metastasis of pancreatic tumors].

L Häberle, R Braren, A M Schlitter, I Esposito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L HäberleInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
R BrarenInstitut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Deutschland.
A M SchlitterInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
I EspositoInstitut für Pathologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. irene.esposito@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a 5-year survival rate that has remained stagnant at 6 % for decades, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still one of the most fatal malignancies. Despite intensive research, currently available therapy options are less than adequate. As more than half of the patients already show distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, metastatic disease should be a primary focus in the development of new therapeutic strategies. New findings from basic research provide various interesting approaches: molecular profiling of the primary tumor seems to be a possible method to gain knowledge about the prognosis, metastatic potential and therapy response of each individual case of PDAC. Certain subpopulations of cancer stem cells also seem to be of importance in metastasis of PDAC and could become potential therapeutic targets in the future. Interactions between tumor cells and their microenvironment are another crucial factor in the metastasis of pancreatic cancer and present various new starting points for potential therapies. As the number of cell types and signaling pathways that are found to play a role in PDAC metastasis continue to grow, the next big challenge will be to translate these findings into viable clinical applications.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDisease ProgressionGenetic HeterogeneityHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateTumor MicroenvironmentCancer stem cellsMetastasisMolecular heterogeneityPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID26391249
OpenAlexW2196907615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.