Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26391045›Full record

ArticleCurrent Alzheimer research2016

Effects of Maternal Choline Supplementation on the Septohippocampal Cholinergic System in the Ts65Dn Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.

Christy M Kelley, Jessica A Ash, Brian E Powers, Ramon Velazquez, Melissa J Alldred, Milos D Ikonomovic, Stephen D Ginsberg, Barbara J Strupp, Elliott J Mufson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current Alzheimer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nerve Growth Factor Compromise in Down Syndrome.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christy M Kelley
Jessica A Ash
Brian E Powers
Ramon Velazquez
Melissa J Alldred
Milos D Ikonomovic
Stephen D Ginsberg
Barbara J Strupp
Elliott J MufsonBarrow Neurological Institute, Dept. Neurobiology, Phoenix, AZ 85031, USA. Elliott.mufson@dignityhealth.org.
Barrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

Uncovering Alzheimer's disease risk mechanisms through neuron-specific analysis of autophagy and endosomal-lysosomal functionP01AG017617 · NIA · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI NIXON, RALPH A. · 2000 to 2021
$40.0M
TAU, AB, SYNUCLEIN AND NITRATIVE/OXIDATIVE DAMAGE IN MCIP01AG014449 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI IKONOMOVIC, MILOS D · 1997 to 2024
$39.7M
Cellular and Molecular Medial Temporal Lobe Pathology in Elderly PreMCI subjectsR01AG043375 · NIA · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI GINSBERG, STEPHEN D, MUFSON, ELLIOTT JAY · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
Perinatal choline therapy in a mouse model of Down Syndrome & Alzheimer's DiseaseR01HD057564 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI STRUPP, BARBARA J · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
Genetics, Neurobiology, and Cognition in Down SyndromeR01HD045224 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MACLEAN, KENNETH N · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS AG043375NIA NIH HHS AG107617NIA NIH HHS P01 AG014449NIA NIH HHS P01AG014449NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017617NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043375NICHD NIH HHS HD045224NICHD NIH HHS HD057564NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045224NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, is marked by intellectual disability (ID) and early onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology including hippocampal cholinergic projection system degeneration. Here we determined the effects of age and maternal choline supplementation (MCS) on hippocampal cholinergic deficits in Ts65Dn mice compared to 2N mice sacrificed at 6-8 and 14-18 months of age. Ts65Dn mice and disomic (2N) littermates sacrificed at ages 6-8 and 14-18 mos were used for an aging study and Ts65Dn and 2N mice derived from Ts65Dn dams were maintained on either a choline-supplemented or a choline-controlled diet (conception to weaning) and examined at 14-18 mos for MCS studies. In the latter, mice were behaviorally tested on the radial arm Morris water maze (RAWM) and hippocampal tissue was examined for intensity of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunoreactivity. Hippocampal ChAT activity was evaluated in a separate cohort. ChAT-positive fiber innervation was significantly higher in the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in Ts65Dn mice compared with 2N mice, independent of age or maternal diet. Similarly, hippocampal ChAT activity was significantly elevated in Ts65Dn mice compared to 2N mice, independent of maternal diet. A significant increase with age was seen in hippocampal cholinergic innervation of 2N mice, but not Ts65Dn mice. Degree of ChAT intensity correlated negatively with spatial memory ability in unsupplemented 2N and Ts65Dn mice, but positively in MCS 2N mice. The increased innervation produced by MCS appears to improve hippocampal function, making this a therapy that may be exploited for future translational approaches in human DS.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAgingAnimalsCholineCholine O-AcetyltransferaseDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeFemaleGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicHippocampusHumansMaleMaternal-Fetal RelationsMaze LearningMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCholineCholine O-AcetyltransferaseNootropic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26391045
PMCPMC4733527
OpenAlexW2283246482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.