Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26390971›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2015

Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: an overview of in vivo research.

Kim E M van Kessel, Tahlita C M Zuiverloon, Arnout R Alberts, Joost L Boormans, Ellen C Zwarthoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Afatinib Activity in Platinum-Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With ERBB Alterations.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. The KLF16/MYC feedback loop is a therapeutic target in bladder cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  5. Research progress of MUC1 in genitourinary cancers.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim E M van KesselDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tahlita C M ZuiverloonDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Arnout R AlbertsDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ellen C ZwarthoffDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is poor and new therapies are needed. Currently, none of the targeted agents that are approved for cancer therapy have been approved for the treatment of bladder cancer and the few clinical trials that have been performed had limited success, often owing to a lack of efficacy and toxic effects. However, many other novel targeted agents have been investigated in animal models of bladder cancer. EGFR, FGFR-3, VEGF, mTOR, STAT3, the androgen receptor and CD24 are molecular targets that could be efficiently inhibited, resulting in reduced tumour growth, and that have been investigated in multiple independent studies. Several other targets, for example COX-2, IL-12, Bcl-xL, livin and choline kinase α, have also been observed to inhibit tumour growth, but these findings have not been replicated to date. Limitations of several studies include the use of cell lines with mutations downstream of the target, providing resistance to the tested therapy. Furthermore, certain technologies, such as interfering RNAs, although effective in vitro, are not yet ready for clinical applications. Further preclinical research is needed to discover and evaluate other possible targets, but several validated targets are now available to be studied in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomedical ResearchDrug Delivery SystemsGene TargetingGenetic TherapyHumansUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26390971
OpenAlexW2215466275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.