Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26390920›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Comparing half-dose photodynamic therapy with high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (the PLACE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Myrte B Breukink, Susan M Downes, Giuseppe Querques, Elon H C van Dijk, Anneke I den Hollander, Rocio Blanco-Garavito, Jan E E Keunen, Eric H Souied, Robert E MacLaren, Carel B Hoyng and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01797861 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial Comparing Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01797861 phase4completednot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial Comparing Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With High-density Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Treatment in Patients With Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled140ConditionsChronic Central Serous ChorioretinopathyArmsHalf-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT), Micropulse laser (ML) treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual and anatomical evaluation of navigated subthreshold micropulse laser versus photodynamic therapy in managing chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Dealing with the Verteporfin Shortage: Treatment Options and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic and Non-Resolving Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Quantitative assessment of intervortex anastomosis in central serous chorioretinopathy and fellow eyes: Does the size of anastomotic vessels matter for the diagnosis?Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Myrte B BreukinkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Susan M DownesOxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, West Wing Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Giuseppe QuerquesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Paris Est Creteil, Center Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, 40 avenue du Verdun, 94000, Creteil, France.
Elon H C van DijkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anneke I den HollanderDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rocio Blanco-GaravitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Paris Est Creteil, Center Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, 40 avenue du Verdun, 94000, Creteil, France.
Jan E E KeunenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eric H SouiedDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Paris Est Creteil, Center Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, 40 avenue du Verdun, 94000, Creteil, France.
Robert E MacLarenOxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, West Wing Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sascha FauserDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Camiel J F BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. C.J.F.Boon@lumc.nl.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLPhilips (Netherlands) · NLUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) is an eye disease characterized by an accumulation of serous fluid under the retina. It is postulated that this fluid accumulation results from hyperpermeability and swelling of the choroid, the underlying vascular tissue of the eye, causing a dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium. This fluid accumulation causes neuroretinal detachment. A prolonged neuroretinal detachment in the macula can lead to permanent vision loss. Therefore, treatment is aimed primarily at achieving resolution of subretinal fluid, preferably within the first 4 months after diagnosis of the disease. A broad spectrum of treatment modalities has been investigated in cCSC, but no consensus exists on the optimal treatment of cCSC. Currently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment (HSML) are among the most frequently cited treatments in obtaining successful neuroretinal reattachment. METHODS/

designThis is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of half-dose PDT to HSML in treating patients with cCSC. A total of 156 patients will be recruited, 78 patients in each treatment arm, with a maximum follow-up duration of 8 months after the first treatment. A complete ophthalmological examination with vision-related quality of life (NEI VFQ-25) and stress questionnaires, will be performed at baseline, 6 to 8 weeks after the first treatment, 6 to 8 weeks after a second treatment (if necessary), and at the final follow-up visit at 7 to 8 months after the first treatment. Treatment visits will be scheduled within 3 weeks after the baseline visit, and within 3 weeks after the first control visit, if a second treatment is required. DISCUSSION: Both half-dose PDT and HSML may be effective treatments in cCSC, but because of the lack of prospective randomized controlled trials, which treatment should be the first choice remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of half-dose PDT to HSML. The primary endpoint to evaluate efficacy will be a complete absence of subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography after treatment. Secondary functional endpoints include change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity on microperimetry, and NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire of visual functioning. Registration number Institutional Review Board (CMO Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands): 2013/203 NL nr.: 41266.091.13

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01797861 . Date of registration: 21 February 2013.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleNetherlandsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID26390920
PMCPMC4578347
OpenAlexW1954343960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.