Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26389663›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2015

Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells.

Adam Filipczyk, Carsten Marr, Simon Hastreiter, Justin Feigelman, Michael Schwarzfischer, Philipp S Hoppe, Dirk Loeffler, Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris, Max Endele, Bernhard Schauberger and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Propagating pluripotency - The conundrum of self-renewal.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  3. An expanded view of cell competition.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Control of cell state transitions by post-transcriptional regulation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Science advances · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam FilipczykResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Carsten MarrInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Simon HastreiterResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Justin FeigelmanInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael SchwarzfischerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Philipp S HoppeResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Dirk LoefflerResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Konstantinos D KokkaliarisResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Max EndeleResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Bernhard SchaubergerResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Oliver HilsenbeckResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Stavroula SkylakiResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Jan HasenauerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Konstantinos AnastassiadisStem Cell Engineering, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Timm SchroederResearch Unit Stem Cell Dynamics, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEETH Zurich · CHTU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF) networks are thought to regulate embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency. However, TF expression dynamics and regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood. We use reporter mouse ESC lines allowing non-invasive quantification of Nanog or Oct4 protein levels and continuous long-term single-cell tracking and quantification over many generations to reveal diverse TF protein expression dynamics. For cells with low Nanog expression, we identified two distinct colony types: one re-expressed Nanog in a mosaic pattern, and the other did not re-express Nanog over many generations. Although both expressed pluripotency markers, they exhibited differences in their TF protein correlation networks and differentiation propensities. Sister cell analysis revealed that differences in Nanog levels are not necessarily accompanied by differences in the expression of other pluripotency factors. Thus, regulatory interactions of pluripotency TFs are less stringently implemented in individual self-renewing ESCs than assumed at present.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell TrackingEmbryonic Stem CellsGene ExpressionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanog Homeobox ProteinOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pluripotent Stem CellsBacterial ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouseOctamer Transcription Factor-3Recombinant Fusion ProteinsRed Fluorescent ProteinTranscription Factorsyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID26389663
OpenAlexW2192104980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.