Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26388877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Analysis of main effect QTL for thousand grain weight in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by genome-wide association mapping.

Christine D Zanke, Jie Ling, Jörg Plieske, Sonja Kollers, Erhard Ebmeyer, Viktor Korzun, Odile Argillier, Gunther Stiewe, Maike Hinze, Felix Neumann and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fungal Disease Tolerance with a Focus on Wheat: A Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Meta-QTL mapping for wheat thousand kernel weight.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christine D ZankeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Germany.
Jie LingLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Germany.
Jörg PlieskeTraitGenetics GmbH Gatersleben, Germany.
Sonja KollersKWS LOCHOW GmbH Bergen, Germany.
Erhard EbmeyerKWS LOCHOW GmbH Bergen, Germany.
Viktor KorzunKWS LOCHOW GmbH Bergen, Germany.
Odile ArgillierSyngenta France S.A.S. Orgerus, France.
Gunther StieweSyngenta Seeds GmbH Bad Salzuflen, Germany.
Maike HinzeSyngenta Seeds GmbH Bad Salzuflen, Germany.
Felix NeumannTraitGenetics GmbH Gatersleben, Germany.
Andrea EichhornTraitGenetics GmbH Gatersleben, Germany.
Andreas PolleyTraitGenetics GmbH Gatersleben, Germany.
Cornelia JaeneckeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Germany.
Martin W GanalTraitGenetics GmbH Gatersleben, Germany.
Marion S RöderLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grain weight, an essential yield component, is under strong genetic control and at the same time markedly influenced by the environment. Genetic analysis of the thousand grain weight (TGW) by genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed with a panel of 358 European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties and 14 spring wheat varieties using phenotypic data of field tests in eight environments. Wide phenotypic variations were indicated for the TGW with BLUEs (best linear unbiased estimations) values ranging from 35.9 to 58.2 g with a mean value of 45.4 g and a heritability of H(2) = 0.89. A total of 12 candidate genes for plant height, photoperiodism and grain weight were genotyped on all varieties. Only three candidates, the photoperiodism gene Ppd-D1, dwarfing gene Rht-B1and the TaGW-6A gene were significant explaining up to 14.4, 2.3, and 3.4% of phenotypic variation, respectively. For a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of TGW-QTL genotyping data from 732 microsatellite markers and a set of 7769 mapped SNP-markers genotyped with the 90k iSELECT array were analyzed. In total, 342 significant (-log10 (P-value) ≥ 3.0) marker trait associations (MTAs) were detected for SSR-markers and 1195 MTAs (-log10(P-value) ≥ 3.0) for SNP-markers in all single environments plus the BLUEs. After Bonferroni correction, 28 MTAs remained significant for SSR-markers (-log10 (P-value) ≥ 4.82) and 58 MTAs for SNP-markers (-log10 (P-value) ≥ 5.89). Apart from chromosomes 4B and 6B for SSR-markers and chromosomes 4D and 5D for SNP-markers, MTAs were detected on all chromosomes. The highest number of significant SNP-markers was found on chromosomes 3B and 1B, while for the SSRs most markers were significant on chromosomes 6D and 3D. Overall, TGW was determined by many markers with small effects. Only three SNP-markers had R(2) values above 6%.

Indexed as

90K iSELECT chipassociation mappingcandidate genesgrain sizelinkage disequilibriumSSRthousand grain weightTriticum aestivum L.

Identifiers

PMID26388877
PMCPMC4555037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.