Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26388698›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2015

British Columbia Healthy Connections Project process evaluation: a mixed methods protocol to describe the implementation and delivery of the Nurse-Family Partnership in Canada.

Susan M Jack, Debbie Sheehan, Andrea Gonzalez, Harriet L MacMillan, Nicole Catherine, Charlotte Waddell, BCHCP Process Evaluation Research Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan M JackSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON Canada L8S 4K1.
Debbie SheehanChildren's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Room 2400, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3 Canada.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Offord Centre for Child Studies, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON Canada L8S 4K1.
Harriet L MacMillanDepartments of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, and of Pediatrics, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada.
Nicole CatherineChildren's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Room 2400, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3 Canada.
Charlotte WaddellChildren's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Room 2400, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3 Canada.
BCHCP Process Evaluation Research Team
Simon Fraser University · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nurse-Family Partnership is a home visitation program for first-time, socially and economically disadvantaged mothers. The effectiveness of this public health intervention has been well established in the United States; however, whether the same beneficial outcomes will be obtained within the Canadian context is unknown. As part of the British Columbia Healthy Connections Project, which includes a trial comparing Nurse-Family Partnership's effectiveness with existing services in British Columbia, we are conducting a process evaluation to describe and explain how the intervention is implemented and delivered across five regional Health Authorities.

methodsA convergent parallel mixed methods research design will be used to address the process evaluation objectives. The principles of interpretive description will guide all sampling, data collection and analytic decisions in the qualitative component of the study. The full population of public health nurses and supervisors (n = 71) will discuss their experiences of implementing and delivering the program in interviews (or focus groups). Managers (n = 5-15) responsible for this portfolio will also be interviewed annually. Fidelity reports with quantitative data on the reach and the dose of the intervention will be collected and analyzed. Summaries of team meetings and supervisory sessions will be analyzed. Data will be used to compare, corroborate and explain results and variances across the five regional Health Authorities. DISCUSSION: The process evaluation results will be of immediate instrumental use to the program implementers to inform intervention delivery. Findings will contribute to the emerging body of evidence surrounding: 1) professional nurse home visitation practice issues; 2) best practices for meeting the needs of families living in rural and remote communities; 3) a deeper understanding of how health and social issues such as mental health problems including substance misuse and exposure to intimate partner violence affect a young mother's capacity to parent; and 4) strategies to support professionals from the primary care, public health and child welfare sectors to work collaboratively to meet the needs of children and families who are at risk or experiencing maltreatment.

Indexed as

Home visitationInterventionMixed methodsNurse-Family PartnershipProcess evaluationPublic health nurses

Identifiers

PMID26388698
PMCPMC4574451
OpenAlexW1758683487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.