Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26388687›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2015

Pentoxifylline and electromagnetic field improved bone fracture healing in rats.

Yusuf Atalay, Nedim Gunes, Mehmet Dervis Guner, Veysi Akpolat, Mustafa Salih Celik, Rezzan Guner

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Signalling pathways underlying pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. Comparative effects of systemic administration of levofloxacin and cephalexin on fracture healing in rats.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Review
  12. [Effect of low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on activity of rat calvarial osteoblasts through IGF-1R/NO signaling pathway].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuf AtalayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Nedim GunesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Mehmet Dervis GunerDepartment of Orthopedics, Medicana Hospitals, Ankara, Turkey.
Veysi AkpolatDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Mustafa Salih CelikDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Rezzan GunerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Dicle University · TRAfyon Kocatepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline (PTX), electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and a mixture of both materials on bone fracture healing in a rat model. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: Group A, femur fracture model with no treatment; Group B, femur fracture model treated with PTX 50 mg/kg/day intraperitoneal injection; Group C, femur fracture model treated with EMF 1.5±0.2 Mt/50 Hz/6 hours/day; and Group D, femur fracture model treated with PTX 50 mg/kg/day intraperitoneal injection and EMF 1.5±0.2 Mt/50 Hz/6 hours/day.

resultsBone fracture healing was significantly better in Group B and Group C compared to Group A (P<0.05), but Group D did not show better bone fracture healing than Group A (P>0.05).

conclusionIt can be concluded that both a specific EMF and PTX had a positive effect on bone fracture healing but when used in combination, may not be beneficial.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemoral FracturesFracture HealingInjections, IntraperitonealMalePentoxifyllinePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsRatsRats, WistarPentoxifyllinePhosphodiesterase Inhibitorsboneselectromagnetic fieldsfracture healingpentoxifyllinephosphodiesterase inhibitorrats

Identifiers

PMID26388687
PMCPMC4571933
OpenAlexW1634416457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.