Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26387517›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task.

Fiona D Zeeb, P J J Baarendse, L J M J Vanderschuren, Catharine A Winstanley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. GABANeuropharmacology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Which came first: Cannabis use or deficits in impulse control?Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  20. Effects of 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona D ZeebDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. fiona.zeeb@camh.ca.
P J J BaarendseDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L J M J VanderschurenDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Catharine A WinstanleyDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. cwinstanley@psych.ubc.ca.

Funding

Social play behavior in periadolescent rats in relation to later drug abuseR01DA022628 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI VANDERSCHUREN, LOUK JMJ · 2007 to 2011
$921k
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStudies employing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) demonstrated that areas of the frontal cortex, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), are involved in the decision-making process. However, the precise role of these regions in maintaining optimal choice is not clear.

objectivesWe used the rat gambling task (rGT), a rodent analogue of the IGT, to determine whether inactivation of or altered dopamine signalling within discrete cortical sub-regions disrupts decision-making.

methodsFollowing training on the rGT, animals were implanted with guide cannulae aimed at the prelimbic (PrL) or infralimbic (IL) cortices, the OFC, or the ACC. Prior to testing, rats received an infusion of saline or a combination of baclofen and muscimol (0.125 μg of each/side) to inactivate the region and an infusion of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (0, 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 μg/side).

resultsRats tended to increase their choice of a disadvantageous option and decrease their choice of the optimal option following inactivation of either the IL or PrL cortex. In contrast, OFC or ACC inactivation did not affect decision-making. Infusion of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist into any sub-region did not alter choice preference.

conclusionsOnline activity of the IL or PrL cortex is important for maintaining an optimal decision-making strategy, but optimal performance on the rGT does not require frontal cortex dopamine D2 receptor activation. Additionally, these results demonstrate that the roles of different cortical regions in cost-benefit decision-making may be dissociated using the rGT.

Indexed as

AnimalsBaclofenBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorDecision MakingDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsFrontal LobeGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-B Receptor AgonistsGamblingMaleMuscimolRatsRats, Long-EvansBaclofenDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-B Receptor AgonistsMuscimolAnterior cingulate cortexDecision-makingDopamine receptorInfralimbic cortexOrbitofrontal cortexPrelimbic cortexProbabilityPunishmentRat gambling taskReward

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.