Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26387030›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2015

Combination therapy with milrinone and esmolol for heart protection in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Zenggeng Wang, Qinghua Wu, Xiangbi Nie, Jinghua Guo, Chunli Yang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ivabradine in Septic Shock: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zenggeng WangMedical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. zenggengwangw@163.com.
Qinghua WuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Nanchang University, Nanchang, 30006, Jiangxi, China.
Xiangbi NieICU, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, No. 92 Patriotic Way, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Jinghua GuoICU, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, No. 92 Patriotic Way, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Chunli YangICU, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, No. 92 Patriotic Way, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNNanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAs a β-adrenoceptor antagonist (β-blocker), esmolol can reduce cardiac output and the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor milrinone has been shown to improve heart contractility in patients with septic shock. This study was performed to assess the effects of esmolol combined with milrinone in patients with severe sepsis.

methodsThis prospective randomized study was conducted in patients with severe sepsis in the intensive care unit of the Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (Nanchang, Jiangsu, China) between June 2013 and June 2014. Patients were randomly divided into control (C), milrinone (M), and milrinone-esmolol (ME) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of controlling the heart rate (HR) to achieve target levels. Secondary outcomes included the 28-day survival rate and changes in hemodynamic variables, organ function variables, myocardial injury markers, and the serum levels of proinflammatory factors.

resultA total of 90 patients with severe sepsis were included in this study (30 per group). The HR in the ME group was lower than in the M and C groups after 12 h. The rate of successful HR control during the first 96 h was significantly higher in the ME group (60.0 vs. 33.3 % in the M group, vs. 26.7 % in the C group). Also, patients in the ME group had higher 28-day overall survival compared with the M (Log rank statistic = 5.452; P = 0.020) and C groups (Log rank statistic = 10.206; P = 0.001). Additionally, several variables showed significant improvement in the ME group 96 h after treatment compared with the M and C groups (P < 0.05).

conclusionCombination therapy with milrinone and esmolol could improve cardiac function and the 28-day survival rate in patients with severe sepsis.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultCardiotonic AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHeartHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilrinonePropanolaminesProspective StudiesProtective AgentsSepsisAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsCardiotonic AgentsesmololMilrinonePropanolaminesProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26387030
OpenAlexW1919871165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.