Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26386993›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2016

The Effectiveness of an Intervention to Enhance Cooperation Between Sick-Listed Employees and Their Supervisors (COSS).

Nicole Hoefsmit, Inge Houkes, Nicolle Boumans, Cindy Noben, Bjorn Winkens, Frans J N Nijhuis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole HoefsmitDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands. nicole_hoefsmit@outlook.com.
Inge HoukesDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nicolle BoumansDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cindy NobenDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frans J N NijhuisDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Early return-to-work (RTW) after sick leave is considered to support employees' quality of life. Successful RTW requires adequate cooperation between absent employees and their supervisors. This study assesses the effectiveness of an intervention for COoperation regarding RTW between Sick-listed employees and their Supervisors (COSS; i.e. 'conversation roadmap', monitoring of cooperation and, if necessary, extra occupational physician support). Methods In this field study, employees on sick leave for 2-10 weeks, aged 18 up to and including 60, and performing paid labour for at least 12 h per week were included. Terminally ill were excluded. Multivariate regression (correcting for baseline quality of life) was used to compare 6-months follow up data regarding quality of life between the groups. Using Cox regression analyses, time until first-, full-, and sustainable RTW was compared between groups. Results In total 64 employees received COSS or common practice. No significant group differences were found regarding all study outcomes. The COSS group had a higher chance of work resumption than the common practice group. The hazard ratio was 1.39 for first RTW (95 % CI 0.81-2.37), 1.12 for full RTW (95 % CI 0.65-1.93) and 1.10 for sustainable RTW (95 % CI 0.63-1.95). Conclusions COSS has no significant effects. Yet, the results regarding work resumption show a tendency towards effectiveness. Therefore, COSS can be further developed and applied in practice. Researchers should try to prevent some limitations of the present study in future research, for instance by finding a more common research setting.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorQuality of LifeReturn to WorkAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsSelf EfficacySick LeaveSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival AnalysisCooperationEffect evaluationInterventionReturn-to-workSick leave

Identifiers

PMID26386993
PMCPMC4854938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.