Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26386159›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2015

Factors Predicting Visual Acuity Outcome in Intermediate, Posterior, and Panuveitis: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial.

John H Kempen, Mark L Van Natta, Michael M Altaweel, James P Dunn, Douglas A Jabs, Susan L Lightman, Jennifer E Thorne, Janet T Holbrook, Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [DOG and BVA guideline no. 24b : Noninfectious uveitis posterior].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunity status and expression of molecular markers (ICAM-1, CD5, CD25, CD95) on lymphocytes of patients with recurrent anterior uveitis complicated by macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk of Cataract in Intermediate Uveitis.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  11. Visual Acuity Outcome over Time in Non-Infectious Uveitis.Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John H KempenOcular Inflammation Service, Department of Ophthalmology/Scheie Eye Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology/Scheie Eye Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: john.kempen@uphs.upenn.edu.
Mark L Van NattaCenter for Clinical Trials, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael M AltaweelFundus Photograph Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
James P DunnMid-Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Douglas A JabsCenter for Clinical Trials, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Ophthalmology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Susan L LightmanUniversity College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer E ThorneCenter for Clinical Trials, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Janet T HolbrookCenter for Clinical Trials, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group

Funding

Multi-Center Uveitis Steriod Treatment (MUST) TrialU10EY014660 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLBROOK, JANET T. · 2004 to 2016
$33.6M
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) TrialU10EY014655 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JABS, DOUGLAS A · 2004 to 2016
$4.6M
Reading Center: Multicenter Uveitis Steroid TrialU10EY014656 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALTAWEEL, MICHAEL M · 2004 to 2015
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014655NEI NIH HHS U10EY014655NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014656NEI NIH HHS U10EY014656NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014660NEI NIH HHS U10EY014660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify factors associated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) presentation and 2-year outcome in 479 intermediate, posterior, and panuveitic eyes.

designCohort study using randomized controlled trial data.

methodsMulticenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial masked BCVA measurements at baseline and at 2 years follow-up used gold-standard methods. Twenty-three clinical centers documented characteristics per protocol, which were evaluated as potential predictive factors for baseline BCVA and 2-year change in BCVA.

resultsBaseline factors significantly associated with reduced BCVA included age ≥50 vs <50 years; posterior vs intermediate uveitis; uveitis duration >10 vs <6 years; anterior chamber (AC) flare >grade 0; cataract; macular thickening; and exudative retinal detachment. Over 2 years, eyes better than 20/50 and 20/50 or worse at baseline improved, on average, by 1 letter (P = .52) and 10 letters (P < .001), respectively. Both treatment groups and all sites of uveitis improved similarly. Factors associated with improved BCVA included resolution of active AC cells, resolution of macular thickening, and cataract surgery in an initially cataractous eye. Factors associated with worsening BCVA included longer duration of uveitis (6-10 or >10 vs <6 years), incident AC flare, cataract at both baseline and follow-up, pseudophakia at baseline, persistence or incidence of vitreous haze, and incidence of macular thickening.

conclusionsIntermediate, posterior, and panuveitis have a similarly favorable prognosis with both systemic and fluocinolone acetonide implant treatment. Eyes with more prolonged/severe inflammatory damage and/or inflammatory findings initially or during follow-up have a worse visual acuity prognosis. The results indicate the value of implementing best practices in managing inflammation.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedDrug ImplantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPanuveitisTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID26386159
PMCPMC4657141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.