Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26386145›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2015

An Old Story Retold: Loss of G1 Control Defines A Distinct Genomic Subtype of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Qiyan Wang, Jian Bai, Amir Abliz, Ying Liu, Kenan Gong, Jingjing Li, Wenjie Shi, Yaqi Pan, Fangfang Liu, Shujuan Lai and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autoimmune Diseases in the Bioinformatics Paradigm. Preface.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qiyan WangMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Jian BaiCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Amir AblizMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Ying LiuMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Kenan GongCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Jingjing LiMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Wenjie ShiCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yaqi PanMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Fangfang LiuMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Shujuan LaiCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Haijun YangAnyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.
Changdong LuAnyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.
Lixin ZhangAnyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.
Wei ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Ruiping XuAnyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.
Hong CaiMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China. Electronic address: drhcai@gmail.com.
Yang KeMOE Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China. Electronic address: keyang@bjmu.edu.cn.
Changqing ZengCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. Electronic address: czeng@big.ac.cn.
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNAnyang Tumor Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a high mortality rate. To determine the molecular basis of ESCC development, this study sought to identify characteristic genome-wide alterations in ESCC, including exonic mutations and structural alterations. The clinical implications of these genetic alterations were also analyzed. Exome sequencing and verification were performed for nine pairs of ESCC and the matched blood samples, followed by validation with additional samples using Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome SNP arrays were employed to detect copy number alteration (CNA) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in 55 cases, including the nine ESCC samples subjected to exome sequencing. A total of 108 non-synonymous somatic mutations (NSSMs) in 102 genes were verified in nine patients. The chromatin modification process was found to be enriched in our gene ontology (GO) analysis. Tumor genomes with TP53 mutations were significantly more unstable than those without TP53 mutations. In terms of the landscape of genomic alterations, deletion of 9p21.3 covering CDKN2A/2B (30.9%), amplification of 11q13.3 covering CCND1 (30.9%), and TP53 point mutation (50.9%) occurred in two-thirds of the cases. These results suggest that the deregulation of the G1 phase during the cell cycle is a key event in ESCC. Furthermore, six minimal common regions were found to be significantly altered in ESCC samples and three of them, 9p21.3, 7p11.2, and 3p12.1, were associated with lymph node metastasis. With the high correlation of TP53 mutation and genomic instability in ESCC, the amplification of CCND1, the deletion of CDKN2A/2B, and the somatic mutation of TP53 appear to play pivotal roles via G1 deregulation and therefore helps to classify this cancer into different genomic subtypes. These findings provide clinical significance that could be useful in future molecular diagnoses and therapeutic targeting.

Indexed as

Loss of HeterozygosityAdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell CycleCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagusExomeFemaleG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGene DosageGenomic InstabilityGenomicsCCND1 protein, humanCDKN2B protein, humanCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell cycle deregulationCopy number alterationEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaGenomic subtypeSomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID26386145
PMCPMC4610972
OpenAlexW1633328188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.