Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26386063›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Genomic evidence reveals numerous Salmonella enterica serovar Newport reintroduction events in Suwannee watershed irrigation ponds.

Baoguang Li, Scott A Jackson, Jayanthi Gangiredla, Weimin Wang, Huanli Liu, Ben D Tall, Junia Jean-Gilles Beaubrun, Michele Jay-Russell, George Vellidis, Christopher A Elkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A two-year study ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Revisiting the Biological Behavior ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Colonization and Internalization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Presence and Persistence ofFrontiers in public health · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Baoguang LiDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA baoguang.li@fda.hhs.gov.
Scott A JacksonDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Jayanthi GangiredlaDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Weimin WangDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Huanli LiuDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Ben D TallDivision of Virulence Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Junia Jean-Gilles BeaubrunDivision of Virulence Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Michele Jay-RussellUniversity of California, Davis Western Center for Food Safety, Davis, California, USA.
George VellidisUniversity of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
Christopher A ElkinsDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous work indicated a predominance (56.8%) of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport among isolates recovered from irrigation ponds used in produce farms over a 2-year period (B. Li et al., Appl Environ Microbiol 80:6355-6365, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02063-14). This observation provided a valuable set of metrics to explore an underaddressed issue of environmental survival of Salmonella by DNA microarray. Microarray analysis correctly identified all the isolates (n = 53) and differentiated the S. Newport isolates into two phylogenetic lineages (S. Newport II and S. Newport III). Serovar distribution analysis showed no instances where the same serovar was recovered from a pond for more than a month. Furthermore, during the study, numerous isolates with an indistinguishable genotype were recovered from different ponds as far as 180 km apart for time intervals as long as 2 years. Although isolates within either lineage were phylogenetically related as determined by microarray analysis, subtle genotypic differences were detected within the lineages, suggesting that isolates in either lineage could have come from several unique hosts. For example, strains in four different subgroups (A, B, C, and D) possessed an indistinguishable genotype within their subgroups as measured by gene differences, suggesting that strains in each subgroup shared a common host. Based on this comparative genomic evidence and the spatial and temporal factors, we speculated that the presence of Salmonella in the ponds was likely due to numerous punctuated reintroduction events associated with several different but common hosts in the environment. These findings may have implications for the development of strategies for efficient and safe irrigation to minimize the risk of Salmonella outbreaks associated with fresh produce.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationFloridaGenotypeIntroduced SpeciesMolecular TypingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhylogenyPondsRiversSalmonella entericaWater Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID26386063
PMCPMC4644655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.