Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385980›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

The Genomic Impacts of Drift and Selection for Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Justin P Gerke, Jode W Edwards, Katherine E Guill, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra, Michael D McMullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A genomic analysis of the University of Nebraska Replicated Recurrent Selection program.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Maximization through optimization? On the relationship between hybrid performance and parental genetic distance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin P GerkeDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 rossibarra@ucdavis.edu justin.gerke@gmail.com.
Jode W EdwardsCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Katherine E GuillPlant Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Columbia Missouri 65211.
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDepartment of Plant Sciences, Center for Population Biology, and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616 rossibarra@ucdavis.edu justin.gerke@gmail.com.
Michael D McMullenDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 Plant Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Columbia Missouri 65211.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although maize is naturally an outcrossing organism, modern breeding utilizes highly inbred lines in controlled crosses to produce hybrids. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's reciprocal recurrent selection experiment between the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and the Iowa Corn Borer Synthetic No. 1 (BSCB1) populations represents one of the longest running experiments to understand the response to selection for hybrid performance. To investigate the genomic impact of this selection program, we genotyped the progenitor lines and >600 individuals across multiple cycles of selection using a genome-wide panel of ∼40,000 SNPs. We confirmed previous results showing a steady temporal decrease in genetic diversity within populations and a corresponding increase in differentiation between populations. Thanks to detailed historical information on experimental design, we were able to perform extensive simulations using founder haplotypes to replicate the experiment in the absence of selection. These simulations demonstrate that while most of the observed reduction in genetic diversity can be attributed to genetic drift, heterozygosity in each population has fallen more than expected. We then took advantage of our high-density genotype data to identify extensive regions of haplotype fixation and trace haplotype ancestry to single founder inbred lines. The vast majority of regions showing such evidence of selection differ between the two populations, providing evidence for the dominance model of heterosis. We discuss how this pattern is likely to occur during selection for hybrid performance and how it poses challenges for dissecting the impacts of modern breeding and selection on the maize genome.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticSelection, GeneticComputer SimulationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticZea maysartificial selectiongenetic driftheterosismaizerecurrent selection

Identifiers

PMID26385980
PMCPMC4649645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.