Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385966›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life.

Cody E Hinchliff, Stephen A Smith, James F Allman, J Gordon Burleigh, Ruchi Chaudhary, Lyndon M Coghill, Keith A Crandall, Jiabin Deng, Bryan T Drew, Romina Gazis and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Male alternative reproductive tactics and sperm competition: a meta-analysis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  16. A meta-analysis on the evolution of the Lombard effect reveals that amplitude adjustments are a widespread vertebrate mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Why don't all animals avoid inbreeding?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Cody E HinchliffEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
Stephen A SmithEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; karen.cranston@gmail.com eebsmith@umich.edu.
James F AllmanInterrobang Corporation, Wake Forest, NC 27587;
J Gordon BurleighDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611;
Ruchi ChaudharyDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611;
Lyndon M CoghillField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605;
Keith A CrandallComputational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, VA 20147;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-3389
Jiabin DengDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611;
Bryan T DrewDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849;
Romina GazisDepartment of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610;
Karl GudeSchool of Journalism, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;
David S HibbettDepartment of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610;
Laura A KatzBiological Science, Clark Science Center, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063;
H Dail LaughinghouseBiological Science, Clark Science Center, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063;
Emily Jane McTavishDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045;
Peter E MidfordField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605;
Christopher L OwenDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611;
Richard H ReeField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605;
Jonathan A ReesNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705;
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611;
Tiffani WilliamsComputer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.
Karen A CranstonNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705; karen.cranston@gmail.com eebsmith@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-9499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life, we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tips-the Open Tree of Life. Realization of this tree required the assembly of two additional community resources: (i) a comprehensive global reference taxonomy and (ii) a database of published phylogenetic trees mapped to this taxonomy. Our open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be continuously updated when new phylogenetic and taxonomic data become digitally available. Although data coverage and phylogenetic conflict across the Open Tree of Life illuminate gaps in both the underlying data available for phylogenetic reconstruction and the publication of trees as digital objects, the tree provides a compelling starting point for community contribution. This comprehensive tree will fuel fundamental research on the nature of biological diversity, ultimately providing up-to-date phylogenies for downstream applications in comparative biology, ecology, conservation biology, climate change, agriculture, and genomics.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsClassificationHumansbiodiversityphylogenysynthesistaxonomytree of life

Identifiers

PMID26385966
PMCPMC4611642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.