Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385964›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2015

Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation.

Rohit Reja, Vinesh Vinayachandran, Sujana Ghosh, B Franklin Pugh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ribosome Structural Changes Dynamically Affect Ribosome Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Context-dependent function of the transcriptional regulator Rap1 in gene silencing and activation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Enhanced gene regulation by cooperation between mRNA decay and gene transcription.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rohit RejaCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Vinesh VinayachandranCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Sujana GhoshCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
B Franklin PughCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF TBP DIMERSR01GM059055 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI PUGH, B FRANKLIN · 2000 to 2020
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM059055NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 137 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) of Saccharomyces provide a model for gene coregulation. We examined the positional and functional organization of their regulators (Rap1 [repressor activator protein 1], Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1), the transcription machinery (TFIIB, TFIID, and RNA polymerase II), and chromatin at near-base-pair resolution using ChIP-exo, as RPGs are coordinately reprogrammed. Where Hmo1 is enriched, Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1 cross-linked broadly to promoter DNA in an RPG-specific manner and demarcated by general minor groove widening. Importantly, Hmo1 extended 20-50 base pairs (bp) downstream from Fhl1. Upon RPG repression, Fhl1 remained in place. Hmo1 dissociated, which was coupled to an upstream shift of the +1 nucleosome, as reflected by the Hmo1 extension and core promoter region. Fhl1 and Hmo1 may create two regulatable and positionally distinct barriers, against which chromatin remodelers position the +1 nucleosome into either an activating or a repressive state. Consistent with in vitro studies, we found that specific TFIID subunits, in addition to cross-linking at the core promoter, made precise cross-links at Rap1 sites, which we interpret to reflect native Rap1-TFIID interactions. Our findings suggest how sequence-specific DNA binding regulates nucleosome positioning and transcription complex assembly >300 bp away and how coregulation coevolved with coding sequences.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalNucleosomesRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsNucleosomesRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsChIP-seqchromatingene regulation mechanismstranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID26385964
PMCPMC4579351
OpenAlexW2266968783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.