Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385793›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Barriers to and delays in accessing breast cancer care among New Zealand women: disparities by ethnicity.

Lis Ellison-Loschmann, Ridvan Firestone, Lucy Aquilina, Fiona McKenzie, Michelle Gray, Mona Jeffreys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Waka ama: An exemplar of indigenous health promotion in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19: we must not forget about Indigenous health and equity.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Urban Rural Differences in Breast Cancer in New Zealand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lis Ellison-LoschmannCentre for Public Health Research, Massey University, P O Box 756, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. l.ellison-loschmann@massey.ac.nz.
Ridvan FirestoneCentre for Public Health Research, Massey University, P O Box 756, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. r.t.firestone@massey.ac.nz.
Lucy AquilinaUniversity of Bristol, Tyndall Ave, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK. la8977.2008@my.bristol.ac.uk.
Fiona McKenzieCentre for Public Health Research, Massey University, P O Box 756, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. mckenzief@fellows.iarc.fr.
Michelle GrayCentre for Public Health Research, Massey University, P O Box 756, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. m.gray@massey.ac.nz.
Mona JeffreysSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol, BS6 7TQ, UK. mona.jeffreys@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnequal access to health care contributes to disparities in cancer outcomes. We examined the ethnic disparity in barriers to accessing primary and specialist health care experienced by New Zealand women with breast cancer.

methodsWomen diagnosed with a primary invasive breast cancer between 2005 and 2007 were eligible. There were 1,799 respondents, n = 302 Māori (the indigenous population of NZ), n = 70 Pacific and n = 1,427 non-Māori/non-Pacific women. Participants completed a questionnaire listing 12 barriers grouped into three domains for analysis: personal; practical; and health care process factors, and reported the number of days between seeing a primary and a specialist care provider. Chi-squared, Fisher exact tests and logistic regression were used to assess uni- and multivariable differences in prevalence between ethnic groupings.

resultsThe prevalence of reporting three or more barriers was 18% among Pacific, 10% among Māori and 3% among non-Māori/non-Pacific women (P <0.001). The most commonly reported barriers were fear (Māori women) and cost (Pacific and non-Māori/non-Pacific women). Ethnic differences in reported barriers were not explained by deprivation or diabetes prevalence. Women with diabetes reported a two-fold higher risk of experiencing barriers to care compared to those without diabetes (odds ratio [OR]: 2.06, 95%CI 1.20 to 3.57). Māori and Pacific women were more likely to face delays (median 14 days) in seeing a specialist than non-Māori/non-Pacific women (median 7 days); these differences were not explained by the reported barriers.

conclusionsPatterns of reported barriers to care differed according to ethnicity and were not explained by deprivation, or presence of co-morbidity. Māori and Pacific women are more likely to experience barriers to breast cancer care compared to non- Māori/non-Pacific women. We identified two key barriers affecting care for Māori and Pacific women; (a) delays in follow-up, and (b) the impact of co-morbid conditions. Future New Zealand work needs to focus attention on health care process factors and improving the interface between primary and secondary care to ensure quality health care is realised for all women with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsComorbidityEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNew ZealandPopulation GroupsPrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26385793
PMCPMC4575458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.