Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385776›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2016

Impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on cognition in early postmenopausal women.

Chitra Lal, Michelle M DiBartolo, Suchit Kumbhare, Charlie Strange, Jane E Joseph

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Women's Perspective.Journal of sleep medicine and disorders · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chitra LalPulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 812, Msc 630, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. lalch@musc.edu.
Michelle M DiBartoloDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Suchit KumbharePulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 812, Msc 630, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Charlie StrangePulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 812, Msc 630, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Jane E JosephDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has a higher prevalence in postmenopausal women who are not on hormone replacement therapy (HRT), as compared to premenopausal women. Cognitive impairment (CI) is associated with OSAS and the early postmenopausal state. We hypothesized that compared to postmenopausal women at low risk for OSAS, postmenopausal women at high risk for OSAS would report worse cognitive function.

methodsEarly postmenopausal women not on HRT between the ages of 45 and 60 years, within 5 years of natural menopause, were enrolled. Participants completed a REDCap survey which collected information on demographics and risk factors, Berlin questionnaire to screen subjects for OSAS risk, and the Mail-In Cognitive Function Screening Instrument (MCFSI) score which was used to assess CI.

resultsOf 381 respondents, 127 were omitted due to missing/duplicate data or not meeting inclusion criteria. One hundred fifty-four women were classified as high risk for OSAS (OSAS+), and 100 were classified as low risk for OSAS (OSAS-). OSAS- women reported lifetime smoking, lifetime drinking, and recreational drug use more often than OSAS+ women, while OSAS+ women reported a depression diagnosis more often. The mean MCFSI score in the OSAS+ group was significantly higher (worse cognition) than in the OSAS- group after controlling for covariates (5.59, 95 % CI 5.08-6.11 vs. 4.29, 95 % CI 3.64-4.93, p < 0.05).

conclusionEarly postmenopausal women at high risk for OSAS report more CI than those at low risk for OSAS. Future studies should identify biomarkers of this CI and define the degree of reversibility of CI with OSAS treatment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesComorbidityDementiaDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPostmenopauseRisk FactorsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveBerlin questionnaireCognitive impairmentHippocampusHypoxemiaMail-in Cognitive Function Screening InstrumentObstructive sleep apnea syndromePostmenopausal

Identifiers

PMID26385776
OpenAlexW1730207836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.