Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385634›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2016

Mechanisms of pro-arrhythmic abnormalities in ventricular repolarisation and anti-arrhythmic therapies in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Elisa Passini, Ana Mincholé, Raffaele Coppini, Elisabetta Cerbai, Blanca Rodriguez, Stefano Severi, Alfonso Bueno-Orovio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Atrial electrophysiology in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: current insights and knowledge gaps.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa PassiniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13QD, United Kingdom; Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Ana MincholéDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13QD, United Kingdom.
Raffaele CoppiniDepartment NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence 50139, Italy.
Elisabetta CerbaiDepartment NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence 50139, Italy.
Blanca RodriguezDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13QD, United Kingdom.
Stefano SeveriDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Cesena 47521, Italy.
Alfonso Bueno-OrovioDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13QD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alfonso.bueno@cs.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a cause of sudden arrhythmic death, but the understanding of its pro-arrhythmic mechanisms and an effective pharmacological treatment are lacking. HCM electrophysiological remodelling includes both increased inward and reduced outward currents, but their role in promoting repolarisation abnormalities remains unknown. The goal of this study is to identify key ionic mechanisms driving repolarisation abnormalities in human HCM, and to evaluate anti-arrhythmic effects of single and multichannel inward current blocks.

methodsExperimental ionic current, action potential (AP) and Ca(2+)-transient (CaT) recordings were used to construct populations of human non-diseased and HCM AP models (n=9118), accounting for inter-subject variability. Simulations were conducted for several degrees of selective and combined inward current block.

resultsSimulated HCM cardiomyocytes exhibited prolonged AP and CaT, diastolic Ca(2+) overload and decreased CaT amplitude, in agreement with experiments. Repolarisation abnormalities in HCM models were consistently driven by L-type Ca(2+) current (ICaL) re-activation, and ICaL block was the most effective intervention to normalise repolarisation and diastolic Ca(2+), but compromised CaT amplitude. Late Na(+) current (INaL) block partially abolished repolarisation abnormalities, with small impact on CaT. Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger (INCX) block effectively restored repolarisation and CaT amplitude, but increased Ca(2+) overload. Multichannel block increased efficacy in normalising repolarisation, AP biomarkers and CaT amplitude compared to selective block.

conclusionsExperimentally-calibrated populations of human AP models identify ICaL re-activation as the key mechanism for repolarisation abnormalities in HCM, and combined INCX, INaL and ICaL block as effective anti-arrhythmic therapies also able to partially reverse the HCM electrophysiological phenotype.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, L-TypeCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicElectrophysiological PhenomenaHeart VentriclesHumansModels, BiologicalMyocytes, CardiacSodium-Calcium ExchangerAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, L-TypeSodium-Calcium ExchangerHypertrophic cardiomyopathyIn silico drug testingInter-subject variabilityPro-arrhythmic mechanismsRepolarization reserve

Identifiers

PMID26385634
PMCPMC4915817
OpenAlexW1660719507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.