Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385617›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2016

Impaired regeneration: A role for the muscle microenvironment in cancer cachexia.

Erin E Talbert, Denis C Guttridge

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cancer Cachexia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MuSCs and IPCs: roles in skeletal muscle homeostasis, aging and injury.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E TalbertDepartment of Molecular Virology, Immunology, and Medical Genetics, Human Cancer Genetics Program, and the Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Denis C GuttridgeDepartment of Molecular Virology, Immunology, and Medical Genetics, Human Cancer Genetics Program, and the Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: denis.guttridge@osumc.edu.
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Tumor ImmunologyT32CA090223 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARSON, WILLIAM E. · 2002 to 2023
$4.1M
(PQD6) Muscle stem cells and cancer cachexiaR01CA180057 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GUTTRIDGE, DENIS C · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180057NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While changes in muscle protein synthesis and degradation have long been known to contribute to muscle wasting, a body of literature has arisen which suggests that regulation of the satellite cell and its ensuing regenerative program are impaired in atrophied muscle. Lessons learned from cancer cachexia suggest that this regulation is simply not a consequence, but a contributing factor to the wasting process. In addition to satellite cells, evidence from mouse models of cancer cachexia also suggests that non-satellite progenitor cells from the muscle microenvironment are also involved. This chapter in the series reviews the evidence of dysfunctional muscle repair in multiple wasting conditions. Potential mechanisms for this dysfunctional regeneration are discussed, particularly in the context of cancer cachexia.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCachexiaHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyMyoblastsNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26385617
PMCPMC4922677
OpenAlexW1654505355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.