Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385348›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

Empirical antibiotic therapy for pneumonia in intensive care units: a multicentre, retrospective analysis of potentially pathogenic microorganisms identified by endotracheal aspirates cultures.

J B J Scholte, H L Duong, C Linssen, H Van Dessel, D Bergmans, R van der Horst, P Savelkoul, P Roekaerts, W van Mook

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J B J ScholteZentrum für Intensivmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Luzern 16, Switzerland. janscholte@hotmail.com.
H L DuongDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C LinssenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
H Van DesselDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
D BergmansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R van der HorstDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
P SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P RoekaertsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
W van MookDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to explore the presumed relationship between the days of hospitalisation and microorganisms identified by endotracheal aspirate cultures in relation to adequate empirical treatment strategies of pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). All potentially pathogenic microorganisms identified by (surveillance) cultures of endotracheal aspirates obtained in the ICUs of two Dutch teaching hospitals in 2007 and 2012 were retrospectively collected and analysed. Antibiotic susceptibilities to 11 antibiotics were calculated for several time points (days or weeks) after hospital admission and expressed per patient-day. In total, 4184 potentially pathogenic microorganisms identified in 782 patients were analysed. Prevalence of the classic early-onset pneumonia-causing microorganisms decreased from 55 % on the first four days to 34 % on days 4-6 after hospital admission (p < 0.0001). Susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was below 70 % on all days. Except for days 0 and 12, susceptibility to ceftriaxone was below 80 %. The overall susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam was 1518/1973 (77 %) in 2007 vs. 727/1008 (67 %) in 2012 (p < 0.0001). After day 8 of hospital admission, susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was below 80 % in 2012. After one week of hospital admission, susceptibilities to antibiotics were lower in the hospital that included that antibiotic in the local empirical treatment protocols as compared to the hospitals in which that antibiotic was not or infrequently included: 90/434 (21 %) vs. 117/398 (29 %); p = 0.004 for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 203/433 (47 %) vs. 253/398 (64 %); p < 0.001 for ceftriaxone. No cut-off in the number of days after hospital admission could be identified to distinguish early-onset from late-onset pneumonia. Consequently, the choice of empirical antibiotics should probably not be based on the time of onset.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNetherlandsPneumonia, BacterialRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTracheaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26385348
PMCPMC4607706
OpenAlexW1919104969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.