Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385265›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2016

Local tumor control probability modeling of primary and secondary lung tumors in stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Matthias Guckenberger, Rainer J Klement, Michael Allgäuer, Nicolaus Andratschke, Oliver Blanck, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Karin Dieckmann, Marciana Duma, Iris Ernst, Ute Ganswindt and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dose prescription and reporting in stereotactic body radiotherapy: A multi-institutional study.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Rainer J KlementDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Germany.
Michael AllgäuerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Germany.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UKSH Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Judit Boda-HeggemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin DieckmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Marciana DumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Iris ErnstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Peter HassDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph HenkenberensDepartment of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Germany.
Richard HolyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany.
Detlef ImhoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Henning K KahlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Augsburg, Germany.
Robert KrempienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Germany.
Fabian LohausDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital C.G. Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Ursula NestleDepartment of Radiation Oncology Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Germany.
Meinhard Nevinny-StickelDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
Cordula PetersenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nurenberg, Germany.
Jan StreblowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.
Thomas G WendtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Germany.
Andrea WittigDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Pilipps-University Marburg, Germany.
Michael FlentjeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Germany.
Florian SterzingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHBarmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus Wien · ATFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences · DEHeidelberg University · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATJena University Hospital · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DELeopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo evaluate whether local tumor control probability (TCP) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) varies between lung metastases of different primary cancer sites and between primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and secondary lung tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective multi-institutional (n=22) database of 399 patients with stage I NSCLC and 397 patients with 525 lung metastases was analyzed. Irradiation doses were converted to biologically effective doses (BED). Logistic regression was used for local tumor control probability (TCP) modeling and the second-order bias corrected Akaike Information Criterion was used for model comparison.

resultsAfter median follow-up of 19 months and 16 months (n.s.), local tumor control was observed in 87.7% and 86.7% of the primary and secondary lung tumors (n.s.), respectively. A strong dose-response relationship was observed in the primary NSCLC and metastatic cohort but dose-response relationships were not significantly different: the TCD90 (dose to achieve 90% TCP; BED of maximum planning target volume dose) estimates were 176 Gy (151-223) and 160 Gy (123-237) (n.s.), respectively. The dose-response relationship was not influenced by the primary cancer site within the metastatic cohort.

conclusionsDose-response relationships for local tumor control in SBRT were not different between lung metastases of various primary cancer sites and between primary NSCLC and lung metastases.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalProbabilityRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesLung metastasesNon-small cell lung cancerStereotactic body radiotherapyTumor control probability

Identifiers

PMID26385265
OpenAlexW1648328586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.