Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385104›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2015

[Regulatory aspects of biosimilars. Myths and facts].

C K Schneider, M Weise

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C K SchneiderAbteilung Arzneimittelzulassung und -Zugänglichkeit, Danish Health and Medicines Authority, Axel Heides Gade 1, 2300, Kopenhagen, Dänemark. ckschneider@gmx.de.
M WeiseBiosimilar Medicinal Products Working Party (BMWP), Europäische Arzneimittelagentur, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiosimilars are currently a hot topic and there are many unsolved questions, misunderstandings and sometimes considerable uncertainty, especially among clinicians and patients. Regulatory agencies, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issue guidelines for the development and approval of biosimilars, which are based on scientific principles.

objectiveThis article addresses some of the frequently noted misunderstandings and misperceptions. For example, why biosimilars are (or can only be) "similar" but not "identical" compared to the original pharmaceutical product, and aspects, such as the pharmaceutical quality of biosimilars, immunogenicity and the approval process for biosimilars are highlighted.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsGovernment RegulationDrug ApprovalDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug IndustryDrug SubstitutionEuropean UnionBiological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsApprovalEuropean Medicines AgencyGuidelinesOriginal formulationRegulatory agencies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.