ReviewBMC cardiovascular disorders2015
Recurrent acute coronary syndrome and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent coronary artery disease and immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Successful management of the recurrent acute in-stent thrombosis despite optimal medical therapy: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Review
- Acute Stent Thrombosis in an Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Patient: Striking the Balance Using Eltrombopag.JACC. Case reports · 2024Article
- Inpatient outcomes of NSTEMI among patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a propensity matched national study.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Paradoxical Thrombosis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.Cureus · 2022Review
- Identification of key molecular markers of acute coronary syndrome using peripheral blood transcriptome sequencing analysis and mRNA-lncRNA co-expression network construction.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Refractory Coronary Stent Thrombosis in a Patient with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia on Eltrombopag.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
- Outcomes of hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction and immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a cross sectional study over 15 years.American journal of blood research · 2020Article
- Impact of immune thrombocytopenic purpura on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- Recurrent Coronary Thrombus in a Patient with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia with Treatment Using Eltrombopag.Case reports in cardiology · 2019Article
- SOCS1 gene promoter methylation status is associated with in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlatelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute and chronic complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet inhibition is a cornerstone in the management of these patients. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a bleeding disorder characterized by premature platelet destruction mediated by autoantibodies. The safety of antiplatelet therapy and PCI in patients who have ACS and ITP is unknown. The aim of the present study is to discuss the management strategies for patients who have ACS and ITP and to review limited data available in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a patient with ITP who underwent three separate coronary interventions. The first PCI with stenting was performed in the left anterior descending artery 5 years ago while the patient suffered an anterior acute myocardial infarction, and the platelet count at admission was 90 × 10(9)/L. The patient presented with recurrent ACS and severe in-stent restenosis 5 years after the first PCI, and the platelet count at admission was 18 × 10(9)/L, and elevated to 87 × 10(9)/L after platelets transfusion. He was treated successfully with cutting balloon angioplasty under anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and antiagregation with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. Four months later after cutting balloon angioplasty, the patient received an intracoronary stent when he once again presented with recurrent ACS in the setting of restenosis. The patient has been observed for 1.5 years without restenosis after the third PCI.
conclusionWe reviewed all the cases in the literature involving PCI and discussed the management strategies in patients with ITP and ACS. Available data suggest that PCI can be safe and feasible, and the risk-benefit equation of PCI procedures and antiplatelet therapies should be carefully evaluated, and the treatment should be individualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.