Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26385094›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2015

Comparative study of anti-angiogenic activities of luteolin, lectin and lupeol biomolecules.

Rashmi K Ambasta, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Dhiraj Kumar, Renu Sharma, Niraj Kumar Jha, Pravir Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Marine Seagrass Extract ofMarine drugs · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antiangiogenic Effect of Flavonoids and Chalcones: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Antiangiogenic activity of PLGA-Lupeol implants for potential intravitreal applications.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rashmi K AmbastaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. rashmiambasta@gmail.com.
Saurabh Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. jhasaurabh017@gmail.com.
Dhiraj KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. dhiraj1188@gmail.com.
Renu SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. sharmarenu2707@gmail.com.
Niraj Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. nirajkumarjha2011@gmail.com.
Pravir KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University (Former Delhi College of Engineering), Delhi, India. Pravir.Kumar@tufts.edu.
Delhi Technological University · INVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis is a hallmark feature in the initiation, progression and growth of tumour. There are various factors for promotion of angiogenesis on one hand and on the other hand, biomolecules have been reported to inhibit cancer through anti-angiogenesis mechanism. Biomolecules, for instance, luteolin, lectin and lupeol are known to suppress cancer. This study aims to compare and evaluate the biomolecule(s) like luteolin, lupeol and lectin on CAM assay and HT-29 cell culture to understand the efficacy of these drugs.

methodThe biomolecules have been administered on CAM assay, HT-29 cell culture, cell migration assay. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis of the identified targets of these biomolecules have been performed.

resultLuteolin has been found to be better in inhibiting angiogenesis on CAM assay in comparison to lupeol and lectin. In line with this study when biomolecules was administered on cell migration assay via scratch assay method. We provided evidence that Luteolin was again found to be better in inhibiting HT-29 cell migration. In order to identify the target sites of luteolin for inhibition, we used software analysis for identifying the best molecular targets of luteolin. Using software analysis best target protein molecule of these biomolecules have been identified. VEGF was found to be one of the target of luteolin. Studies have found several critical point mutation in VEGF A, B and C. Hence docking analysis of all biomolecules with VEGFR have been performed. Multiple allignment result have shown that the receptors are conserved at the docking site.

conclusionTherefore, it can be concluded that luteolin is not only comparatively better in inhibiting blood vessel in CAM assay, HT-29 cell proliferation and cell migration assay rather the domain of VEGFR is conserved to be targeted by luteolin, lupeol and lectin.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneHT29 CellsHumansLectinsLigandsLupanesLuteolinMolecular Sequence DataPentacyclic TriterpenesSignal TransductionVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Angiogenesis InhibitorsLectinsLigandsLupaneslupeolLuteolinPentacyclic TriterpenesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Identifiers

PMID26385094
PMCPMC4575424
OpenAlexW1898092026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.