Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384936›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

The Healthy Communities Study Nutrition Assessments: Child Diet and the School Nutrition Environment.

Lorrene D Ritchie, Patricia Wakimoto, Gail Woodward-Lopez, Frances E Thompson, Catherine M Loria, Dawn K Wilson, Janice Kao, Patricia B Crawford, Karen L Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Free summer programming on elementary-aged children's food and beverage consumption: a randomized clinical trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lorrene D RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, California; Atkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California. Electronic address: lritchie@ucanr.edu.
Patricia WakimotoAtkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Gail Woodward-LopezAtkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Frances E ThompsonApplied Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Catherine M LoriaDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Dawn K WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Janice KaoAtkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Patricia B CrawfordAtkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Karen L WebbAtkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000041C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multifaceted community interventions directed at improving food environments are emerging, but their impact on dietary change and obesity prevalence has not been adequately documented. The Healthy Communities Study (HCS) is seeking to identify characteristics and combinations of programs and policies that are associated with children's diets and obesity-related outcomes in various types of communities across the U.S. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methods used in 2013-2015 in the HCS to assess dietary intake, school nutrition environments, and other nutrition-related behaviors. The conceptual framework of the HCS is based on the socioecological model and behaviors shown in previous studies to be related to obesity in children guided selection of domains. Nine domains were identified as essential measures of nutrition in the HCS: (1) intake of selected foods and beverages; (2) food patterns and behaviors; (3) social support; (4) home environment; (5) school environment; (6) community environment; (7) breastfeeding history; (8) household food insecurity; and (9) dieting behaviors and body image. Children's dietary intake was assessed using a dietary screener and up to two automated 24-hour recalls. Dietary-related behaviors were assessed by a survey administered to the parent, child, or both, depending on child age. School nutrition measures were obtained from a combination of school staff surveys and researcher observations. Information from these measures is expected to contribute to a better understanding of "what is working" to improve the dietary behaviors that are likely to prevent obesity and improve health in children.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNutrition SurveysResidence CharacteristicsDietHumansPediatric ObesitySchools

Identifiers

PMID26384936
PMCPMC4575770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.