Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384811›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

The use of (18)F-FDG PET to differentiate progressive disease from treatment induced necrosis in high grade glioma.

J W Dankbaar, T J Snijders, P A Robe, T Seute, W Eppinga, J Hendrikse, B De Keizer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Usefulness ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  6. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Neuro-oncology practice · 2021
    Review
  8. The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Non-invasive Radiomic Method UsingFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J W DankbaarDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.w.dankbaar@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-9587
T J SnijdersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P A RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
T SeuteDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W EppingaDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J HendrikseDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B De KeizerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the follow-up of patients treated for high grade glioma, differentiation between progressive disease (PD) and treatment-induced necrosis (TIN) is challenging. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET for the differentiation between TIN and PD after high grade glioma treatment. We retrospectively identified patients between January 2011 and July 2013 that met the following criteria: age >18; glioma grade 3 or 4; treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; new or progressive enhancement on post treatment MRI; FDG PET within 4 weeks of MRI. Absolute and relative (to contralateral white matter) values of SUVmax and SUVpeak were determined in new enhancing lesions on MRI. The outcome of PD or TIN was determined by neurosurgical biopsy/resection, follow-up MRI, or clinical deterioration. The association between FDG PET and outcome was analyzed with univariate logistic regression and ROC analysis for: all lesions, lesions >10, >15, and >20 mm. We included 30 patients (5 grade 3 and 25 grade 4), with 39 enhancing lesions on MRI. Twenty-nine lesions represented PD and 10 TIN. Absolute and relative values of SUVmax and SUVpeak showed no significant differences between PD and TIN. ROC analysis showed highest AUCs for relative SUVpeak in all lesion sizes. Relative SUVpeak for lesions >20 mm showed reasonable discriminative properties [AUC 0.69 (0.41-0.96)]. FDG PET has reasonable discriminative properties for differentiation of PD from TIN in high grade gliomas larger than 20 mm. Overall diagnostic performance is insufficient to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedBrainBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionDrug TherapyFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDG PETHigh grade gliomaMRIProgressive diseaseTreatment induced necrosis

Identifiers

PMID26384811
PMCPMC4592487
OpenAlexW1767513150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.