Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384728›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Improving access to high-quality primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: a mixed method study protocol.

John A Ford, Andrew P Jones, Geoff Wong, Allan B Clark, Tom Porter, Tom Shakespeare, Ann Marie Swart, Nicholas Steel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John A FordDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Andrew P JonesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, London, UK.
Allan B ClarkDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Tom PorterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Tom ShakespeareDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ann Marie SwartNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Nicholas SteelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2014-07-083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe UK has an ageing population, especially in rural areas, where deprivation is high among older people. Previous research has identified this group as at high risk of poor access to healthcare. The aim of this study is to generate a theory of how socioeconomically disadvantaged older people from rural areas access primary care, to develop an intervention based on this theory and test it in a feasibility trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: On the basis of the MRC Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions, three methods will be used to generate the theory. First, a realist review will elucidate the patient pathway based on existing literature. Second, an analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing will be completed using structural equation modelling. Third, 15 semistructured interviews will be undertaken with patients and four focus groups with health professionals. A triangulation protocol will be used to allow each of these methods to inform and be informed by each other, and to integrate data into one overall realist theory. Based on this theory, an intervention will be developed in discussion with stakeholders to ensure that the intervention is feasible and practical. The intervention will be tested within a feasibility trial, the design of which will depend on the intervention. Lessons from the feasibility trial will be used to refine the intervention and gather the information needed for a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval from the regional ethics committee has been granted for the focus groups with health professionals and interviews with patients. Ethics approval will be sought for the feasibility trial after the intervention has been designed. Findings will be disseminated to the key stakeholders involved in intervention development, to researchers, clinicians and health planners through peer-reviewed journal articles and conference publications, and locally through a dissemination event.

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services for the AgedHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsUnited KingdomHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26384728
PMCPMC4577946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.