Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384406›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Food entries in a large allergy data repository.

Joseph M Plasek, Foster R Goss, Kenneth H Lai, Jason J Lau, Diane L Seger, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Paige G Wickner, Sarah P Slight, Frank Y Chang, Maxim Topaz and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. AllergyMap: An Open Source Corpus of Allergy Mention Normalizations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A value set for documenting adverse reactions in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph M PlasekDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Foster R GossDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kenneth H LaiClinical & Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason J LauDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Diane L SegerClinical & Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Kimberly G BlumenthalAllergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Paige G WicknerDivision of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah P SlightDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Division of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Frank Y ChangClinical Informatics, Partners eCare, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Maxim TopazDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Li ZhouDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Clinical Informatics, Partners eCare, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA lzhou2@partners.org.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMass General Brigham · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Encoding and Processing Patient Allergy Information in EHRsR01HS022728 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS 1R01HS022728-01AHRQ HHS R01 HS022728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate food adverse sensitivity documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) is crucial to patient safety. This study examined, encoded, and grouped foods that caused any adverse sensitivity in a large allergy repository using natural language processing and standard terminologies.

methodsUsing the Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning, and Mapping System (MTERMS), we processed both structured and free-text entries stored in an enterprise-wide allergy repository (Partners' Enterprise-wide Allergy Repository), normalized diverse food allergen terms into concepts, and encoded these concepts using the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) and Unique Ingredient Identifiers (UNII) terminologies. Concept coverage also was assessed for these two terminologies. We further categorized allergen concepts into groups and calculated the frequencies of these concepts by group. Finally, we conducted an external validation of MTERMS's performance when identifying food allergen terms, using a randomized sample from a different institution.

resultsWe identified 158 552 food allergen records (2140 unique terms) in the Partners repository, corresponding to 672 food allergen concepts. High-frequency groups included shellfish (19.3%), fruits or vegetables (18.4%), dairy (9.0%), peanuts (8.5%), tree nuts (8.5%), eggs (6.0%), grains (5.1%), and additives (4.7%). Ambiguous, generic concepts such as "nuts" and "seafood" accounted for 8.8% of the records. SNOMED-CT covered more concepts than UNII in terms of exact (81.7% vs 68.0%) and partial (14.3% vs 9.7%) matches. DISCUSSION: Adverse sensitivities to food are diverse, and existing standard terminologies have gaps in their coverage of the breadth of allergy concepts.

conclusionNew strategies are needed to represent and standardize food adverse sensitivity concepts, to improve documentation in EHRs.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicFood HypersensitivityTerminology as TopicAllergensHumansNatural Language ProcessingSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineVocabulary, ControlledAllergensallergy and immunologycontrolledelectronic health recordsfood hypersensitivitynatural language processingsystematized nomenclature of medicinevocabulary

Identifiers

PMID26384406
PMCPMC4954633
OpenAlexW2179627207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.